WHAT THIS ORDINANCE IS. Its recitals say Ord. 25-114 was adopted on 12 November 2025 with formatting errors introduced while uploading the text, that the corrections are 'for clarity purposes only with no changes made to the substance of Ordinance 25-114', and that the Council re-adopts the corrected version so that it can be properly codified. The SUBSTANCE therefore dates from 12 November 2025 and the rules in this overlay date their Chapter 188 provisions to that day; this document is the text to read and to quote. Provisions used: 188-7 definitions (Administrative Agent, Affordable Housing Agreement, Income Restricted Unit, Median Income, Portal, Random Selection Process, Regional Asset Limit, Rent, Workforce Household); 188-8 purpose and the exclusion of LIHTC, Balanced Housing Home Express, HOME, 202, 811, HOPE VI and FHLB AHP units; 188-9 the Division's duties including code-enforcement designation and the fee power; 188-10 the Affordable Housing Agreement, the waitlist, the affirmative marketing plan, the biannual Portal reports, and the withholding of a certificate or temporary certificate of occupancy; 188-11 developer and owner duties; 188-12 eligibility documentation; 188-13 applicant and tenant appeals binding on the owner; 188-14 violation and default; 188-15 phasing, design, amenities and parking, bedroom and income distribution, accessibility; 188-16 the 52 percent average and 60 percent maximum rents, the 70 percent option, the imputed household sizes, the Northeast CPI increase capped at five percent, the utility allowance, association fees; 188-17 affirmative marketing including the residency preference, occupancy standards, random selection, ownership and rental control periods, the 18-month expiration notice and Council right of first refusal, leases and the five percent application fee cap, tenant income eligibility and the 35/40 percent rent burden test, conversions and alternative living arrangements; 188-18 the Municipal Housing Liaison; 188-19 the Administrative Agent; 188-20 enforcement and the $1,200 fine; and Chapter 160 Section R, the $2,000 Affordable Housing Agreement fee and the annual Affordable Housing Portal fees of 3, 5, 7 and 9 percent of maximum rent by income tier. ONE CAUTION ON THE FACE OF THE DOCUMENT: the 'RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE ON AMENDMENTS, IF ANY' block for 6 May 2026 is FILLED IN 9-0, so an amendment was voted on the night of final passage, and the text attached to this file may not reflect it. Nothing in the document identifies what was amended.

EDITION FROM THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: cover reads 'Washington, D.C. / May 17, 2004 / JOINT STATEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE / REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS UNDER THE FAIR HOUSING ACT'. WITHDRAWAL STATUS CHECKED 2026-08-31 AND IT IS NOT WITHDRAWN: this document appears on NEITHER the FHEO withdrawal table at 91 FR 17292 (eight documents, effective 17 Sept 2025) NOR the OGC withdrawal table at 91 FR 44868 (thirteen documents, effective 25 Sept 2025), and it still serves 200 from hud.gov. The 2016 land-use joint statement IS on the OGC list; this one is not. Carries the questions that supply the corpus's accommodation-process rules: Q9 (alternative accommodations and the interactive process), Q10 (failure to agree operates as a denial), Q11 (no extra fee or deposit), Q15 (prompt response; undue delay may be deemed a failure to accommodate), Q16 (permitted inquiries), Q17 (obvious disability, obvious need - no further information may be requested), Q18 (non-obvious disability - the three-part reliable-information test).

EDITION FROM THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: cover reads 'Washington, D.C. / March 5, 2008 / JOINT STATEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE / REASONABLE MODIFICATIONS UNDER THE FAIR HOUSING ACT'. WITHDRAWAL STATUS CHECKED 2026-08-31 AND IT IS NOT WITHDRAWN: absent from both the FHEO table at 91 FR 17292 and the OGC table at 91 FR 44868, and still served from hud.gov. THIS IS THE DOCUMENT THAT STATES THE COST DISTINCTION IN TERMS. Footnote 9: Section 504 and 24 CFR part 8 'obligate housing providers to make and pay for structural changes to facilities, if needed as a reasonable accommodation for applicants and tenants with disabilities, unless doing so poses an undue financial and administrative burden.' Q&A 31 works the same fact pattern twice - a roll-in shower in privately owned housing is a tenant-funded modification, the same shower in federally assisted housing is a provider-funded accommodation. 24 CFR 8.33 states the policy-modification duty without using the words 'pay for', so this Joint Statement is where the allocation is actually written down.

Kansas adds ancestry.

36 pages, 1,670,161 bytes, sha256 e3b225ae9e17de91dc664e83dd2196e8c371ad256d0f3cffee67f949427f847d. Confirmed as the correct current document by the 2027-2029 QAP (Section V), which incorporates this manual by reference. IMPORTANT: page footers within this printing are internally inconsistent -- pages 1-28 are stamped 'Revised March 2026', pages 31-35 are stamped 'Revised December 2023' (pages 29-30 did not extract as text). Two adjacent documents (KHC HOTMA Guidance, Average Income Compliance Policy) resolve HTTP 200 with Content-Length: 0 on KHC's own CDN and could not be read. Confirmed reachable 2026-08-27 despite the archiver reporting it unreachable: plain curl with a standard browser User-Agent. The URL is correct; the fetch was being blocked. Archiver's connection reset was transient. Hash identity confirms this is the same printing the 9 citing rules were authored against, including the internal footer inconsistency the source record already documents (pages 1-28 March 2026, pages 31-35 December 2023). That inconsistency is a property of KHC's printing, not a sign the URL swapped editions. Keep the URL. CORRECTION 2026-08-28: this record said 'pages 29-30 did not extract as text'. They did not fail to extract -- THEY ARE ABSENT. KHC's printed page numbering runs 1-28 then jumps to 31. Confirmed by rendering the PDF pages to image and reading them visually: the render matches what pdftotext returned, footer included. The old wording invites a future pass to hunt for two pages of content that do not exist.

2 pages, 233,184 bytes, sha256 afda513a08970d9feaee47ad26818332745f4fc08600fda17a5b33a2fc154a8d. Listed on KHRC's Housing Compliance page under 'LIHTC Annual Report Forms', where the link text reads '2024 Annual Report Notification Letter' but the document itself is the 2025 one - the letter's own text governs. This is the operative statement of the annual-report due date, which the compliance manual gives only as 'generally in the Spring': the 2025 annual report and compliance fee were due April 15, 2026, with extensions 'only ... for an additional 30 days (May 15, 2026)' on State Form #7. KHRC republishes this letter each December, so the date is verified for report year 2025 only.

112 pages, 1,460,001 bytes, sha256 b3624ddfa3c47cb5acd347a3153084c258db178fe4e083beb54d21415ebc354c. Linked from KHRC's Qualified Allocation Plan page. Carries the fee schedule cited here (sec. II.E: compliance fee 0.009 / 0.004 of the annual federal LIHTC amount, $40 per assisted unit for HUD Resources properties, $250 LURA amendment fee), the compliance-monitoring covenants (sec. XVIII.C), the resyndication and 30-day change-notification requirements (sec. IX), the requirement that the recorded Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants include 'an agreement to not request a qualified contract under IRC Section 42(h)(6)(E)', and the scoring penalties for compliance failures (sec. VII.3). Annual document: a 2027 QAP should be expected around September 2026.

200 pages, 1,437,702 bytes, sha256 8dfb4c8113c42833e4e4dff51d9b917ba9befcbb54cb16fa23151a7d77823c64. THIS IS THE CURRENT EDITION AND IT IS NOT THE FIRST SEARCH HIT. KHRC's own Housing Compliance document library (kshousingcorp.org/housing-partners/khrc-housing-compliance/) lists exactly one compliance manual and this is it. The superseded 2021 edition remains live at /wp-content/uploads/2021/09/2021-Compliance-Policies-and-Procedures-Manual.pdf (HTTP 200 on 2026-08-24, 213 pp, sha256 15d16ece31171ff80d54b36a251cc7da99a537c6e1da3b07f496fdeda9364a27) and ranks above this one in web search; third-party sites also mirror both. The editions differ on a load-bearing point: 2021 sec. 16.7 elects HUD's UPCS with REAC software, 2024 sec. 16.7 elects NSPIRE with the four-level severity scale and the 24-hour life-threatening cure. The 60-day correction period is the same in both. Four candidate 2025/2026 manual paths under the same upload tree returned 404 on 2026-08-24, so no later edition is published. The 2026 QAP sec. XVIII(C) makes use of this manual mandatory: 'Ownership entities and property management companies must use KHRC's Compliance Policy and Procedures Manual.' The manual predates and does not mention HOTMA. ANNOTATION CORRECTED 2026-08-28: this record said 'The manual predates and does not mention HOTMA'. True of the acronym, FALSE of the content. The manual applies HOTMA's asset regime throughout -- $50,000 imputation threshold, necessary/non-necessary personal property, the net-family-asset exclusion list near-verbatim -- and cites 'HUD Notice H 2023-10, F.4.d' expressly. The old wording is what made Kansas a false checked-absence in the analysis map.

70,144 bytes, sha256 d208965291f3850a47aa8ed97573284878dd45819017131cca49a7af48373080. Fetched 2026-08-28 by plain curl with a desktop Chrome User-Agent from KHRC's Housing Compliance page, where the link label ends '(MANDATORY) TC and HOME'. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: footer 'Sample Form #18 / Last Updated Feb 2020'. The upload path 2019/09 and the OLE title field ('MITAS REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE', a leftover from whatever document this was cloned from) are both ignored. THE FORM'S OWN TIMING SENTENCE DISAGREES WITH THE MANUAL AND IS NARROWER: 'This form shall be initiated no earlier than 120 days preceding the anniversary date of move-in and no later than the anniversary date of move-in for each tax credit qualified household' - a window that closes ON the anniversary, where manual sec. 7.2 says only that the form 'must be completed within 120 days of the anniversary date', which a reader can take as a symmetric window. The form also states the year-1-30 scope ('for all properties years 1-30'), warns for HOME and HTF that 'Privilege to self-certify could be revoked', prints AMGI-band checkboxes from 20% to 80%, and prints the two next-available-unit triggers side by side: 'due to exceeding 140% AMGI' (LIHTC) and 'due to exceeding 80% AMGI (HOME Only)'.

39,936 bytes, sha256 94ee3062598bcc3ad581e3639e306914eb47e2782a84878e93cb1f0df85fca3d. Fetched 2026-08-28 by plain curl with a desktop Chrome User-Agent from KHRC's Housing Compliance page. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: footer 'Sample Form #19 / Last Updated Oct 19'; the upload path 2019/09 is not used as the date. Completed by the head of household only, with a three-way A/B/C election and five exception checkboxes. Two things on its face that the manual does not say in the same words: the form's own definition of 'students' expressly includes 'those attending public or private elementary schools, middle or junior high schools, senior high schools' - which is the opposite of the manual's sec. 21.6 year-16 rule reading the student rule down to full-time COLLEGE students - and its test period is 'the current and/or upcoming CALENDAR year', wider than the single calendar year of IRC 151(c)(4). It also carries a standing reporting duty on the tenant: 'I also understand that I am to immediately report any changes in my student status to the Management.'

54,784 bytes, sha256 16966f30fa37ee0e48043e582d814b7642b25e13d5a157fc348fd178efaca892. Fetched 2026-08-28 by plain curl with a desktop Chrome User-Agent from KHRC's Housing Compliance page. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: footer 'Sample Form #19A / Last Updated Oct 19'; the OLE title field still reads 'Exhibit Q1' and the upload path is 2019/09; neither is used. This is the third-party half of the Kansas student regime - it is addressed to and completed by the educational institution, and manual sec. 4.3 makes it mandatory in one specific case: 'if a part-time student is the only household member qualifying the otherwise full-time student household, the part-time student's part time status needs to be verified (Sample Form 19A).' The school is asked seven questions including 'Has the person attended full-time anytime during 5 months of this calendar year?' with the months to be written in, and - notably for a state whose manual contains no HOTMA student financial assistance calculation at all - 'To your knowledge, does the student receive any financial aid in the form of grants or scholarships? Do not include student loans.'

48,410 bytes, sha256 aaca225ff10e7e34188ec30fa06a8fb914ba5447be16ea24a24d11d2dacf0694. Fetched 2026-08-28 by plain curl with a desktop Chrome User-Agent from KHRC's Housing Compliance page (kshousingcorp.org/housing-partners/khrc-housing-compliance/), which is the document library the 2024 compliance manual sec. 6.11 sends owners to; that page is how the current edition was established. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: the running page footer reads 'Kansas Tenant Income Certification (Rev. Dec 23)' and the header 'TENANT INCOME CERTIFICATION FOR THE KANSAS HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM'. The date used is that printed footer; the URL slug ('Dec-2023') and the docx core properties (created 2023-10-04, modified 2023-11-28, creator 'Katie R. Whitehead') are NOT used, and the modified date in fact disagrees with the printed footer by a month. THIS IS WHERE KANSAS PUTS ITS HOTMA ASSET RULE. The manual's prose carries the $50,000 imputation threshold, but the KTIC is where an operator meets it as an instruction: section E's asset table foots 'Total Cash Value: If equal to or less than $50,000 (as adjusted by inflation), it is acceptable to indicate 0', and section F prints the whole two-branch imputation rule. Question D.15 asks about tuition assistance 'not excluded under Title IV, 479B of the Higher Education Act of 1965' and D.14 about payments for blood/plasma donations and research studies - both post-HOTMA formulations - in a manual that never uses the word HOTMA. The form also carries KHRC's five-day signature instruction, its requirement that a calculation tape or worksheet be attached, and printed AMGI-band checkboxes from 20% to 80% plus 140%. Mandatory under manual sec. 3.5: 'The Kansas Tenant Income Certification (KTIC/Sample Form 2) and the Annual Household Certification Update (Sample Form 18) are mandatory KHRC forms.'

43,520 bytes, sha256 100d4ecc6ecb158c82621b655bc82d833bd6080025e9c1c13598e2f7b546d5fd. Fetched 2026-08-28 by plain curl with a desktop Chrome User-Agent from KHRC's Housing Compliance page. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: footer 'Sample Form #21 / Last Updated Oct 19'; the OLE title field reads 'Exhibit T' and the create date is 2007; neither is used. THIS FORM IS WHERE KANSAS PUTS ITS VERIFICATION PROHIBITIONS, and none of them appear in the 200-page manual. Its instruction block confines the instrument four ways - 'The form is to clarify information received by the third-party source. It is not to change information on the verification form. This form is not to be used as a self-affidavit; nor is it to be used to clarify information with the applicant/tenant. All blanks must be completed.' - and then prints, in capitals on its own line in the body of the form, 'DO NOT USE THIS FORM TO TAKE AN OVER INCOME APPLICANT TO AN UNDER INCOME SITUATION.' That single sentence is a substantive limit on the direction in which a Kansas oral or document-review verification may move an eligibility determination, and it exists in exactly one place.

83,456 bytes, sha256 cf844506a5845a9f95a20db0325308637446a0a7ef039603cfe9c854d0b7968f. Fetched 2026-08-28 by plain curl with a desktop Chrome User-Agent from KHRC's Housing Compliance page, where it is listed as 'Sample Form 4: Assets Under $5,000 Template'. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: the title line reads 'UNDER $5,000 ASSET CERTIFICATION' and the footer 'Sample Form #4 / Last Updated Oct 23'. That printed footer is the date used; the URL segment '2023/09' disagrees with it by a month and is not used, nor are the OLE properties (last printed 25 Sep 2023, created and saved 27 Sep 2023, title field 'UNDER $5,000 ASSET CERTIFICATION'). KANSAS PUBLISHES ITS ASSET SELF-CERTIFICATION THRESHOLD IN THIS FORM'S NAME, the same shape as Indiana's '26-2026 Under $52,787'. The figure is $5,000, not the HOTMA indexed imputed income limitation, and the manual's prose agrees: sec. 6.4, 'Owners may allow self-certification of assets if the total value of the household's assets is $5,000 or less. Until further guidance is received from the IRS, this will remain $5,000.' The form's substance is pre-HOTMA throughout - it certifies against '24 CFR 813.102', a citation superseded by 24 CFR 5.603, and it counts stocks, bonds, trust funds and personal property held as an investment as assets - while the same agency's KTIC and manual Chapter 6 apply HOTMA's $50,000 net-family-asset test. Both instruments are live on the same page on the same day. Its one modern feature is a Bitcoin/Cryptocurrency row and a GoFundMe/Crowdsourcing row.

48,640 bytes, sha256 7d8fd32f90d3fd6fa53eb037c08fd1cbfffee067254cb031be2a8c29bc213d50. Fetched 2026-08-28 by plain curl with a desktop Chrome User-Agent from KHRC's Housing Compliance page. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: the footer reads 'Sample Form #9 / Last Updated Oct 19'. NOTE THE URL IS ACTIVELY MISLEADING ON DATE - the filename ends 'TemplateJune14' and the upload path is 2019/09, neither of which is used; only the printed footer is. THIS IS THE ONLY PLACE KHRC PUBLISHES A PHA-STATEMENT INCOME INSTRUMENT. The 2024 compliance manual never mentions a public housing authority income statement, EIV, HUD Form 50058 or HUD Form 50059 anywhere in 200 pages; this form is the whole of Kansas's position, and it consists of a PHA worker certifying 'The total annual gross income for the above-named household, as verified by this Public Housing Authority is ___' for the stated purpose of 'determining eligibility for occupancy in a Low Income Housing Tax Credit project'. KHRC attaches no conditions, no currency rule of its own and no list of acceptable programs, so this is an available instrument rather than a stated safe harbour; the corpus records it as what it is and does not manufacture the missing conditions.

2 pages, 678,226 bytes, sha256 f3799c501b3c4b7d7869586ae18693f820ef0edc401af050056e20c115decf1c. Enumerates the six items of the annual report package in required order, the Procorem Tenant Event Portal validation sequence, and the upload folder and file-naming conventions. It also updates the manual on one point of substance: where sec. 8.8.4(b)(ii) of the 2024 manual offers a KHRC agency utility estimate as a permitted method, checklist item 3 annotates 'LIHTC Agency Estimate (KHRC not currently offering)'.

56 pages, 429,472 bytes, sha256 102cadb36149c73815c6ac41ddd9100cf7c80940a7c2b42a07418b8dbdb8a839, fetched 2026-08-30. The only self-dating is 'July 2018 Update' on the cover and 'rev. July 2018' in the running footer -- a month and year, no day -- so `published` is null rather than a guessed date. Sections used for the King County overlay: Eligible beneficiaries and affordability requirements, p. 8 (rents including utilities at 30 percent of the maximum monthly income level); Where HFP capital funds may be used, p. 9 (TOD anywhere in the County including Seattle, half a mile of high capacity transit); Affordability, pp. 9-10 (below-market requirement, the second statement of the 30 percent gross cap, homeownership at 35 percent); Contracting, p. 16 (contract exhibit contents, promissory note, deed of trust, use and resale covenant, default plus proportional share of net appreciated value, 5 percent or $25,000 retainage); Loan terms, pp. 16-17 (50-year minimum, 0-3 percent interest, deferred payment); TOD Bond Fund Application Fees, p. 17 (2 percent application fee, 1 percent annual simple interest, interest-only due 31 December of the final draw year); Fair housing, access, and affirmative marketing, p. 22 (AFFH pass-through); Management plan, p. 23 (due 3 months after certificate of occupancy, required contents); Capital needs assessment, p. 23 (6 months after completion, 20-year horizon); Close-outs and monitoring, pp. 25-27 (annual report within 30 days of calendar year end, WBARS, initial site visit, five-year rolling plus six-year post-termination retention, triennial physical inspections with annual for highest risk, the written-question written-response escalation ladder, financial penalties and staff replacement); HOME chapter, pp. 40-43 (24 CFR Part 5 adjusted gross income at move-in, self-certification after year one, source documentation every sixth year from project completion, two months of source documentation, rent increases once a year with 30 days' notice, written waiting list and chronological selection, annual County approval of rents and utility allowances, HUD Utility Schedule Model); Annual Monitoring and Risk Analysis, pp. 52-54. THE DOCUMENT IS EIGHT YEARS OLD AND IS STILL THE OPERATIVE GUIDELINES. It cites the '2013 HOME Final Rule' as new, quotes HUD per-unit subsidy limits issued 18 July 2018, and links to kingcounty.gov paths that no longer resolve. It says nothing about HOTMA, NSPIRE, or the 2023 HOME rule changes. The 2026 funding round handout independently confirms that the TOD half-mile radius, the 2 percent origination fee and the 1 percent simple interest are unchanged.

The Wisconsin-law holding interpreted former Wis. Stat. § 101.22 and former Wis. Admin. Code IND 89.01(8), excluding Section 8 vouchers from the source-of-income definition at issue. The opinion also affirmed liability under a separate federal provision then in force. Its state-law holding must not be presented as universal permission for voucher refusals. Current statutory text, subsequent treatment, local protections and program obligations remain separate checks.

Louisiana adds military status and natural, protective, or cultural hairstyle -- a CROWN Act class written into the fair housing provision itself.

This is the CDBG labor-standards statute that 24 CFR 570.603 implements. Two things it says that are routinely got wrong: the wage requirement reaches 'construction work financed in whole or in part with assistance received under this chapter' but applies to the REHABILITATION of residential property ONLY IF the property contains not less than 8 units; and volunteers meeting the three-part test in subsection (b) are outside it entirely. The codified text substitutes 40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, 3146 and 3147 for the old Davis-Bacon Act citation. uscode.house.gov re-renders current text, so this source is not in the codified-law blind spot.

Read 2026-08-29. The date is the page's own printed 'Last modified: April 28, 2026', which is also its dateline. Content used: the covenant's purpose and scope (land use concessions and ordinances that require one, term 'usually 55 or 99 years', runs with the land, binding on future owners, signed by owner/LAHD/City Attorney/City Clerk, recorded with the County Assessor, subordination to first lien position); the covenant preparation timeline (16-24 weeks; Replacement Unit Determination 12-16 weeks and required FIRST); the application document list; the rampla.org account requirement and notarized signature pages; the set-aside unit standards (dispersed, matching bedroom mix by percentage, same amenities except floor coverings and appliance quality); LAHD's lack of discretion over how many units are set aside; income certification BY LAHD before move-in with a 10-day turnaround; covenant monitoring annually for the entire term with annual recertification and an annual report; the non-compliance consequence ('sanctions and/or action by the City Attorney'); and the fee schedule ($5,813 preparation, $1,214 assumption/termination, $5,770 amendment, $173 per restricted unit annual monitoring, all subject to change). WHAT THE PAGE DOES NOT SAY, and no rule asserts: any annual report due date, any cure period, any over-income rule, any lottery or marketing requirement beyond the AAHR listing on the companion page.

Read 2026-08-29. Dated from its own printed 'Last modified: July 7, 2026'. THIS IS THE ONLY DOCUMENT THAT MAPS AN ENTITLEMENT TO A SCHEDULE, and the mapping is the most consequential single fact in the Los Angeles overlay. It names six commonly used schedules -- I (HUD Gross), VI (HCD Net), VII/Mello (HCD Gross), VIII/Unpermitted Dwelling Unit (HCD Gross), IX (TCAC), X (TOC Rent Schedule) -- states that the applicable one depends on project type, that 'The assigned Analyst will make the final determination', and that the schedules are updated annually. It then gives the default mapping separately for LAHD-funded and non-LAHD-funded projects, including two cases where ONE project runs two schedules at once (100% affordable Density Bonus/CHIP: HCD Schedule VII or VI on 20% of total units, TCAC Schedule IX on the remainder). It closes: 'Actual rent schedule determinations are made on an individual property basis depending on the type of entitlements.' The Gross/Net/HUD/HCD/TCAC labels appear ONLY here; the schedule PDFs themselves define none of them.

9 pages, 463,929 bytes, sha256 0398aeb490f7f087ca5320670944b85cbaeee84770bb11347e9727517f21adf8, fetched 2026-08-29. PUBLISHED AND EFFECTIVE ARE NULL DELIBERATELY: the form carries no date anywhere on its face -- no adoption date, no revision line, no footer. Its PDF CreationDate is 1 June 2020 and ModDate 26 October 2021, neither of which is evidence about the instrument. The rules sourced to it are dated from the ordinance it implements, 29 January 2018, which the City's own Resource Guide states twice. A blank template with bracketed fill-ins. THIS IS THE OPERATIVE COMPLIANCE INSTRUMENT FOR ATLANTA INCLUSIONARY ZONING and it carries the whole regime: the two tiers (15% at 80% AMI or 10% at 60% AMI, elected by the owner's initials in Section 2); the definition of Actively Marketed with its 60-day OHCD coordination period and the safe harbour under which an unlet unit still counts if OHCD certifies; the 20-year Affordability Period running from the certificate of occupancy; the rent cap expressed as 'The monthly rent amount (not including utilities and mandatory fees)'; the exclusion of student, hotel, motel, hospital, nursing home and assisted living units from the definition of a Residential Rental Dwelling Unit; the income certification dated not later than lease execution and no more than 30 days before initial occupancy, recertified annually; the 15-day and 30-day certification delivery clocks and the City's express disclaimer of responsibility for accuracy; the eight-field annual detail report and the City's right to require it monthly during lease-up; the five-year retention and the City's inspection right; the Recertification Limit of 120% AMI for the 80% tier and 100% for the 60% tier with a next-available-comparable-unit cure; the substantially-similar and interspersion requirements with their finish-level examples; maintenance to the Atlanta Code of Ordinances with reserved periodic on-site inspections; the survival of obligations on a Disposition and the release only on a City-approved assumption of the whole; the 60-day cure and the judicial remedy of specific performance and injunction with attorneys' fees; and the City's unilateral right to waive or terminate the LURA without any other party's consent. It also recites that it 'will run concurrently with any other LURA that may be associated with the property'.

9 pages, 726,482 bytes, sha256 b36ab504821376171d16f65f8e6efb641434c587c14121722df5ed1cf7c93580, fetched 2026-08-29. Undated on its face; PDF CreationDate 1 June 2020, ModDate 21 January 2021. A SEPARATE REGIME from Inclusionary Zoning: it reaches owners of multi-family residential property 'receiving a grant, incentive, or subsidy through a sale lease-back or other written agreement involving a development authority doing business in the City of Atlanta' and is not limited to the BeltLine and Westside overlays. TWO DIFFERENCES FROM THE INCLUSIONARY ZONING FORM MATTER. Its Affordability Period expires 'either (ii) twenty (20) years thereafter or (iii) upon the end of the term of the grant, incentive or subsidy, whichever is lesser' -- note the defective enumeration, which has no clause (i) on the face of the document. And its Recertification Limits are TRANSPOSED relative to the Inclusionary Zoning form: 100% AMI for the 2(a) 80-percent tier and 120% AMI for the 2(b) 60-percent tier, so on this form the deeper-affordability unit carries the looser continued-occupancy ceiling. One of the two forms contains a drafting transposition and nothing read this pass says which. Cited in this corpus only for those two comparisons; the Public Subsidies Ordinance regime is not separately modelled.

15 pages, 2,734,536 bytes, sha256 23a5b91955107623a4490eaccd8cde1b3a0e5af0b0435a5b6359d0d9f4e208f3, fetched 2026-08-30. NO DATE ON ITS FACE. Its PDF CreationDate is 18 July 2023 and its own text places it in that year by quoting 'The area median income for a family of four for the Washington Metropolitan Area for 2023 was $120,560'; neither is a printed publication date, so `published` is null. Cited here for the County's fullest published definition of a Committed Affordable Unit -- 'guaranteed by agreement with federal, state, or County government, or through mechanisms such as tax-exempt financing, to remain affordable to low- and moderate-income households for a specified period of time; generally, 30 to 75 years. Rents in most cases are affordable to households earning 60% or less of the area median income, although some CAFs have rents affordable to households earning up to 80% AMI.' Its 30-to-75-year range disagrees with the 30-to-60 on the County's live Resident Information page. A resident-facing guide, not a compliance instrument.

1 page, sha256 d8814d0ae4c919173f0a0529141c4fbb84670042b0e0dba507fd28d913c855de. Current-year controlling statement of the February 15 annual package (Exhibit B AOC, Exhibit C, Schedule II(A) per BIN, 12/31 rent roll, UA documentation, Property Data Sheet, monitoring fee), the NextGen-WCMS upload process and file-naming convention, and the $100/month late fee. Reissued annually (2022/2023 predecessors confirmed live at the same folder path) -- T1 cadence: expect a 2027 successor each January.

Confirmed reachable 2026-08-22 via direct curl. 6 pages, sha256 f3f6d045015e95b61dbc871ebde857cdba4155289379cbc2d236597ce59e5edb. Filename says 'DRAFT-v4'; PDF creation/mod date 2024-11-12, still served as the current document on the site in 2026 with no 'final' version found alongside it. Treated as lower-confidence/persuasive because it is explicitly labeled a draft -- rules sourced to this document use 'see_also' interactions rather than 'modifies' and are kept at lower confidence.

Text export 14,774 bytes, sha256 558fa2860d5e57356a707249d21b29a7b19a79190e98602b0c89facb7791fed4; 9 pages as rendered. Addressed 'To: Recipients of DOH's HOME and HTF funds'. Carries Colorado's monitoring machinery -- the on-site frequency tiers by assisted-unit count, the monitoring-letter turnaround and the corrective-action window -- none of which has a federal counterpart in 24 CFR part 92. SUPERSESSION TRAP AND AN INTERNAL CONTRADICTION, RE-CONFIRMED 2026-08-27 AND UNRESOLVED: the document's running header still reads 'Version 2 Updated 4/25/2025' while its own Re: line reads 'Risk-Based Monitoring Policy Version 3 - effective April 1, 2026'. The document therefore states two different versions of itself, and a reader cannot tell from the document whether the body text is the Version 2 text with a Version 3 header line, or the Version 3 text with a stale header. This is recorded as an open question on the Colorado monitoring rules rather than resolved by picking one. Being a Google Doc, it can also be revised in place with no visible signal; the text-export hash is the only change detector. Editorial correction 2026-09-13: agency_id now identifies the issuing Division of Housing (co.doh), replacing the CHFA placeholder (co.hfa); the source issuer and document are unchanged.