145,221 bytes, sha256 7abbc27b443c76496f70adfc353a599d1f4870efaaa33a0701aad2265b2dd641; 2 pages, only page 1 carries text (page 2 is blank in the extracted text layer). A tabular advisory of changes to the HTC Compliance Monitoring Plan; it states on its face that 'minor updates, additions, clarifications, unintentional omissions, and grammatical errors have not been identified in this Summary', so it is a delta document and not a substitute for the CMP.

One source record covers the two companion instruction documents MHC publishes for the same report. Guidelines: 1,059,971 bytes, sha256 539d94893b2b725183dbc1f490253b47295dbd94a980438c2e9c2ec098bbefe9; footer 'MHC Rev 03/2024'; states the May 31 deadline and the $60.00-per-unit manual processing fee. Quick Reference Guide: https://archivemhc.com/Compliance/Forms/HTC/2026%20AOC%20Quick%20Reference%20Guide.pdf, 378,880 bytes, sha256 3c058f48ea3e78e08b990a98d563da467d8d6f51db9d39ff3fcdac36a5302488, footer 'Rev. 3/2026'; describes the five AOC components including the new Part E Property Point of Contact form and the folding of the DFAR into the AOC packet. Kept as one record because the Quick Reference Guide is expressly an update guide to the Guidelines, not a freestanding authority.

243,713 bytes, sha256 70096871c1e123cdaebb2c15f448feda6f51169cc343a3149aca33d834111462. MHC re-issues this bulletin annually and it is the operative statement of the current year's AOC due date and report components; the deadline is therefore a per-year value, not a standing calendar rule.

306,808 bytes, sha256 3c99763f8266a8af259411b5f725ce2f287441d283ce6588e03e71da5bc6d7b7. The operative packaging rule for a Mississippi utility allowance request: it states MHC's review 'will NOT commence until receipt of a complete submission', lists the thirteen required package items (including the Identity of Interest disclosure, the 90-day tenant notice, and the current PHA schedule even when the PHA method is not the one elected), and restates the $150.00 processing fee.

2 pages, 217,386 bytes, sha256 461f3bf3cd64c485e2f9e9b0de165031805b44f776605585fd19167b5466f9b1. Fetched 2026-08-28 by plain curl with a desktop Chrome User-Agent from MHDC's Exhibits and Forms page (/programs/asset-management/program-compliance/compliance-resources/exhibits-forms/), which is how the current printing was established. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: the footer of both pages reads 'REV. 8/6/26'. The URL carries no date at all, so the footer is the only self-dating and is what is used. WHY IT IS CITED: MHDC's prose prints the unadjusted $50,000 repeatedly, but this form -- the instrument an operator actually completes -- prints NO dollar figure anywhere. Its subtitle reads 'For households whose combined net assets do not exceed the applicable Imputed Income Limitation', both worksheet decision lines read 'Is the value in line (5) less than or equal to $' with the amount left blank, and a footnote sends the reader to huduser.gov's inflationary-adjustments page. That is the same pattern as Oregon's CM.04 and the reason the corresponding parameter is emitted with its `value` key absent.

1 page, 241,889 bytes, sha256 a2f6d6f4fda5877a546b611703a8e5a0052aa55aa2c6bb6a1bc88a1c2a2ff096. Fetched 2026-08-28 by plain curl with a desktop Chrome User-Agent from MHDC's Exhibits and Forms page. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: the page footer reads 'REV. 1/20/26'. The hosted filename also ends '20260120' and the two agree; the footer is what is used. WHY IT IS CITED: the form is the printed structure behind Missouri's student rule. It is tripartite -- management prepares it, the student executes the consent, and the educational institution completes the substantive half -- and the institution's half demands a full-time / part-time / N-A mark for every one of the twelve months of the named calendar year, the cost of tuition and required fees per term, the number of terms attended, and a financial-aid table split into 'Amounts Received under Section 479B HEA' and 'Other (e.g. grants/scholarships)'. That split is the HOTMA student-financial-assistance calculation reduced to a form field.

2 pages, 1,364,715 bytes, sha256 0937cb113527dfc8ead5396a384d57e6c033a225c701900a07be90d71a72e6de. Fetched 2026-08-28 by plain curl with a desktop Chrome User-Agent from MHDC's Exhibits and Forms page. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: the page-1 footer reads 'LIHTC' and 'REV. 12/12/23'. The URL carries no date. NOTE ON EDITION SPREAD: this form is the oldest printing in Missouri's current exhibit set (December 2023) and sits beside an Exhibit D revised August 2026 and an Exhibit F revised January 2026 -- MHDC revises its exhibits individually, so an exhibit's age is not evidence that the underlying rule is stale, and no rule here infers one from the other.

32 pages, 715,721 bytes, sha256 42a295e2d230cf8a6e393079c9ce18b42205d423d169b4055de84fd228f5cfa1. Fetched 2026-08-28 with plain curl and a standard desktop Chrome User-Agent from mhdc.com; no bot wall. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: the cover page prints 'HOTMA Manual' and, beneath it, 'March 18, 2026'. That printed cover date is the date used; it is not taken from the URL slug ('hotma-manual-3182026.pdf') or from the PDF metadata (CreationDate/ModDate Wed Mar 18 14:55:07 2026 EDT, Producer 'Microsoft Word for Microsoft 365', Author 'Tasha Douglas'), all three of which happen to agree with it. THIS IS THE MISSING ELIGIBILITY HALF OF THE MISSOURI OVERLAY. The July 2025 LIHTC Compliance Manual's Chapter 5 (Annual Income, Assets, and Verification) is three sentences long and each one says 'refer to the MHDC HOTMA Manual on the MHDC website under Manual and Reference Guides'; Chapter 4 and Part 3.7 repeat the referral. Everything MHDC says about income calculation, net family assets, the asset self-certification threshold, the safe harbour and the verification hierarchy lives here, not in the compliance manual. Structure: Preface; Introduction; Compliance Training Requirements; an MHDC HOTMA Applicability Chart (a three-column HOME / NHTF / LIHTC grid, the load-bearing state-specific artefact -- it is where MHDC records that LIHTC does NOT take 24 CFR 5.609(c) calculation and reexamination); Chapter 1 Income Eligibility (1.1 terms, 1.2 inclusions and exclusions); Chapter 2 Assets (2.1 terms, 2.2 inclusions, 2.3 disposed assets, 2.4 imputed asset income, 2.5 exclusions); Chapter 3 Additional Requirements and Reference (3.1 use of other programs' determination of income, 3.2 verification of other program determinations, 3.3 recertifications, 3.4 HOME and NHTF, 3.5 Verifications, which reproduces HUD Table J2 in full with MHDC's own 'EIV cannot be used for LIHTC purposes' annotation added to three rows); Resources. Located from MHDC's own document library at /programs/asset-management/program-compliance/compliance-resources/manuals-and-reference-guides/, which lists exactly four manuals (Tax Credit, HOME, Qualified Contract Process, HOTMA) -- that page is how the current edition was established.

Confirmed current via the file currently linked from MHDC's live LIHTC Compliance page as of 2026-08-22. 107 pages, 2,579,713 bytes, sha256 b5709e17da0fc905a5885c2cdc94b6ba751c61e5a3a844cf19960498b95c8ff8. This pass reads Parts 3.3.D, 3.4.E, 4.4.A, 4.5, 5.3, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.8, 10.5, and 10.6 only, not the full 107-page manual. Confirmed reachable 2026-08-27 despite the archiver reporting it unreachable: plain curl with a standard browser User-Agent. The URL is correct; the fetch was being blocked. Archiver's connection reset was transient. The PDF's CreationDate is 2025-12-15 while the cover says July 2025 -- that is a re-render of the July 2025 edition, not a later edition, and the hash match against the authoring run settles it. The URL path is an opaque Umbraco media GUID with no edition in it, so a future edition could swap in behind the same URL; keep hashing this one.

38 pages, 761,528 bytes, sha256 c121b7aa78a66ec428f157f4aa591f08eb2b137410529a3656b0a4709856c899, fetched 2026-08-29. The department is styled PHCD on the cover and HCD in the County's current organisation; both names refer to the same body. Sections read and used: Eligibility Requirements -- Occupancy Requirement/Ownership (primary residence, fee simple or a 99-year leasehold with remaining term equal to the loan term, the prohibition on renting or leasing at any time the loan is in effect and the acceleration remedy); Affordability (the fund-source term table: SHIP and Surtax 30 years or until sold, transferred, leased or otherwise disposed of; HOME/CDBG 5, 10 or 20 years by subsidy amount and 15 years for an FHA-insured HOME loan); Eligible Verification (the household composition document list, joint custody at 50 percent of the year, the separated-spouse documentation, and the requirement to count court-ordered child support in full 'whether it is regularly received by the household'); Immigration Status (differing by fund source); Income Section -- Income Qualification (gross anticipated income for all adults over the next 12 months, the SHIP and HOME/CDBG forward-projection rule, the SURTAX-ONLY two-year averaging for self-employed, commission, tip, bonus and overtime income, the six-month commitment letter, and the Florida property law rule on separated spouses); Qualifying Using Section 8 Voucher and Income Recertification (annual recertification for voucher homeownership purchasers only); Income Range of Applicants to Be Served (140 percent for both Surtax and SHIP); Income and Identity Verification; and Asset Limitations (the $50,000 liquid asset recommendation with its retired and permanently disabled carve-out, and the HOME/CDBG/SHIP-only $5,000 imputation at 'the current LIBOR rate as set by HUD').

1,040 pages, 72,313,072 bytes, sha256 32a19ed41dce9c8adbf82a459aea209cfbdff542070b491aacad2f99a289f303, fetched 2026-08-29. PDF CreationDate 2024-04-04. Provisions used from the Conditional Loan Commitment: the Collateral paragraph (promissory note; construction/permanent mortgage with assignment of leases and rents; collateral assignment of leases and rents; collateral assignment of construction documents; rental regulatory agreement where applicable); the Repayable paragraph, which carries the single most important term found for this jurisdiction -- 'The prepayment of any Loan shall not affect the term of affordability set forth in the Rental Regulatory Agreement or in any of the other Loan Documents'; Condition 1 (financial feasibility, subsidy layering and credit underwriting, performed internally and by an independent underwriter, paid for by the borrower, with the County reserving the right to reduce the loan amount or refuse to close); Condition 12 (Surtax and SHIP loans limited to households not greater than 140 percent of AMI, HOME and CDBG loans to not greater than 80 percent); and the six-month commitment expiry with recapture and reallocation of unclosed funds. THE TEMPLATE IS STALE IN ITS PARTICULARS -- the signature block names a Mayor who left office in 2020 and the interest terms cite the FY 2019 RFA -- so only its structural provisions, which the FY 2025 RFA independently corroborates, are relied on.

106 pages, 1,819,776 bytes, sha256 fa39501df4190f4b2acababb22ffe043916adff33c9dfd9989c1549073bf9dc5, fetched 2026-08-29. Sections read and used: the definitions of Income Levels (moderate above 80 to 140 percent, low at or below 80, very low at or below 50, extremely low at 33 or 30 percent or 'Miami-Dade County's adjusted 28% AMI') and Workforce Housing Income Range (60 to 140 percent under Chapter 33 Article XXIIA of the County Code); the Income Averaging discussion of the LIHTC average income test and the rule that electing it may not reduce the ELI unit count committed in the application; Loan Terms and Conditions for FY 2025 (the 1-2 year construction plus 30-year permanent structure and, for every option, 'Subject to rental regulatory agreement for set aside units during the entire 30-year term', 'Subject to FHFC terms, if applicable' and 'Subject to subsidy layering review'); the compliance guidelines page restating Resolution R-697-13 (allocations over $25,000 must be loans secured by recorded instruments, forgivable only on full performance) and Resolution R-617-18 (the elderly housing natural disaster plan, updated annually and made available to residents and first responders); the Section 17-02 re-loan provision; the Features for Elderly Housing Developments list (kitchen and air-conditioned community room on the first, second or third floor, water pump connected to a generator, and a minimum of one generator maintained in good working order and inspected before and after a natural disaster); the elderly set-aside age of 55; and the reference-document list, which names 'Reference 21. Rental Regulatory Agreement - NON-FEDERAL FUNDS' and 'Reference 22. Rental Regulatory Agreement - FEDERAL FUNDS' -- neither of which was locatable on miamidade.gov and both of which are the missing centre of this jurisdiction's ongoing compliance regime.

1 page, 75,156 bytes, sha256 ae3148115a8409425dbfdabdb8ad3f5c685af6b82f142fcbf5818eadac2ac083, fetched 2026-08-29. Date taken off the document's own face: '(Subject to periodic revisions by US HUD Effective (May 1st , 2025)' and '(Income and Mortgage Limits REVISED (May 1st, 2025)'. THE OPERATIVE LIMIT SERIES FOR EVERY MIAMI-DADE COUNTY HOUSING PROGRAMME. Columns at 30, 50, 80, 100, 120 and 140 percent for family sizes one through eight, labelled extremely low, very low and low/moderate, with the note 'SHIP/SURTAX limited to 140 %'. Two observations verifiable on its face and recorded in the rules that cite it. First, the 50, 80, 120 and 140 percent columns are fixed multiples of the 100 percent column at each family size -- for a family of four, 100 percent is $123,900 and the others are exactly $61,950, $99,100, $148,680 and $173,460 -- with a few dollars of rounding drift at family sizes seven and eight, while the 30 percent column follows no such pattern and carries HUD's separately published extremely-low-income figures. Second, the chart states '(MEDIAN INCOME IS $87,200.00 FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY)' while its own 100 percent column for a family of four is $123,900; the two figures cannot both be a four-person median and nothing on the chart reconciles them. The chart's title promises mortgage limits, but the page carries only the income table.

26 pages, 428,819 bytes, sha256 8cf4207515b3ab02cc1d4023a8f793e39491231803f72ae0a2eb9c7d9999d19b, fetched 2026-08-29. PDF CreationDate 2025-05-29. Deliberately left with published=null: CLAUDE.md is explicit that a file name is evidence of nothing and that a date must come off the document's own face or out of a dated instrument adopting it, and this template has neither. THIS IS THE OPERATIVE INSTRUMENT for a Philadelphia Mixed Income Housing property -- DPD's own Compliance Overview says the deed restriction is the best way to find a project's applicable AMI limit. Provisions used: Article 4 § 4.1 (covenants run with the land; the City and its successors, assigns and designees are beneficiaries with the right to enforce in law or equity; non-enforcement is not waiver); Article 5 § 5.1 (the Compliance Period beginning on the date of the Declaration and ending not less than 50 years from the LAST Certificate of Occupancy issued for the Project) and § 5.2 (phasing); Article 6 §§ 6.2 (lease requirements -- writing, all adults as tenant parties, one-year maximum term with the Tenant Voucher exception, no sublet or assignment, acknowledgment of restrictions, Principal Residence with its definition), 6.3 (eligibility determined before initial and each renewed occupancy; the 50/60 percent initial and 100/120 percent continuing ceilings), 6.4 (Gross Rent at 30 percent adjusted for Expected Occupancy, the utility allowance documentation and methodology, and the Tenant Voucher carve-out permitting contract rent above the maximum), 6.5 (comparable quality, extending to maintenance and renovations during the Compliance Period), 6.6 (equal use and enjoyment of amenities at the same cost or free), 6.7 (City audit rights and the records the declarant must maintain), 6.8 (annual certification to DPD), 6.9 (30-day cure after written notice, then the rental licence remedy) and 6.10 (no sale or conversion of an affordable rental unit without the City's prior written consent). TWO DRAFTING DEFECTS ARE REPRODUCED RATHER THAN REPAIRED IN THE RULES THAT CITE THEM: § 6.4's Tenant Voucher carve-out cross-references 'this Section 6.3' while sitting inside § 6.4; and § 6.9's remedy reads 'the City shall be entitled to suspend or otherwise renew a rental license', where renewing a licence is plainly not a remedy and the intended sense is almost certainly a refusal to renew.

4900.3700 states that parts 4900.3700 to 4900.3769 govern the implementation of the housing trust fund program authorized by Minn. Stat. 462A.201. The block divides into capital funding (4900.3720–.3731), operating subsidies (4900.3740–.3746) and rental assistance (4900.3760–.3769); the rules in this batch draw on the capital-funding and rental-assistance halves.

Creates the housing trust fund account in the housing development fund and fixes the programme's income ceilings: 60 percent of the HUD median for the metropolitan area at initial occupancy, with at least 75 percent of funds benefiting households at or below 30 percent, and the mandatory rental-assistance termination test.

Confirmed reachable 2026-08-22 (107-page PDF, downloaded directly from mnhousing.gov and read in full via pdftotext -layout). Chapters 1-10; this pass reads Chapters 4, 5 and 6 (fees, utility allowance, student status/recertification, annual reporting/monitoring fees) closely, not the entire manual line-by-line. PAGE COUNT CORRECTED 2026-08-28: this record described a 39-page PDF 'read in full'. The document is 107 pages (667,477 bytes, sha256 8504e27f04a3ec91344eba3eca0c4f9d375bb398d6af068c5a8a4c1a05a11f7c, cover and all footers 'May 2025'). The 68 pages that were not read are Chapters 5 and 6, pp. 29-87 -- the whole eligibility half of the manual, which is why Minnesota had no eligibility rules until this pass. A wrong page count in a source record is not cosmetic: it silently bounded what anyone believed the document contained.

The binding tenant-selection instrument for Minnesota Housing-funded rental properties, including 9% and 4% housing tax credits. Substantively it is a screening FLOOR, not guidance: it prohibits denial on a credit score alone, on insufficient credit or rental history absent bad-faith withholding, on eviction actions dismissed or decided for the applicant or on judgments three or more years old, and on arrest records without conviction; it caps any minimum income test at an income-to-rent ratio of 2.5; and for supportive housing units it requires Housing First practices and bars screening on housing history, credit history or credit score, with criminal lookbacks capped at seven years for felonies and two for misdemeanours, subject to a controlled-substance and lifetime-sex-offender-registration carve-back. Cited by mn.lihtc.tenant_selection.tsp_guidelines_required and mn.lihtc.tenant_selection.screening_criteria_floor. TRAP: /documents/46579/... is a document-id path that will serve the next revision at the identical address, so a link check cannot detect a new edition and only the sha256 will move.

Minnesota's term is 'status with regard to public assistance' rather than source of income. Subdivision 1(3) carries an express carve-out permitting an adults-only advertisement where the advertiser reasonably believes the familial status provisions do not apply.

1,601,106 bytes, sha256 284166b312818e1a2824c52cd27a222145ea39723704644732940f065658b071. This is the most recent FULL compliance monitoring plan MHC publishes: the same page links 2019-2023 editions and the archive URLs for 2024 CMP.pdf, 2025 CMP.pdf and 2026 CMP.pdf all return 404 (checked 2026-08-24). MHC layers changes on top of it through the annual 'Summary of Updates' advisory (src.ms.compliance_updates_2026), program bulletins, and Section 8 of the QAP, so the CMP text must be read together with those. The published date 2023-01-01 is inferred from the document's own title ('2023 Housing Credit Compliance Monitoring Plan'); the title page also carries 'Revised 2022' and the document states no explicit effective date.

6,055,813 bytes, sha256 e89c10a5cd55d557c008cb5984c70917af0a774c886cfedb776226987767fae9; PDF CreationDate/ModDate 2026-03-02, author 'Lisa Coleman'. Confirmed to be the 2026 plan by its own text (public hearing on 'Mississippi's 2026 Qualified Allocation Plan'; Chart 2 cycle dates run January-April 2026). CAUTION, disclosed rather than smoothed over: every interior page footer of this printing reads '2024 QUALIFIED ALLOCATION PLAN | Mississippi Home Corporation' - a stale template footer, not a content date. Cited here only for Section 5.4 (minimum reserve requirements) and Section 8 (compliance monitoring plan summary, monitoring/late fees, post-year-15 fee, mandatory training, qualified contract).

4 pages, 550,855 bytes, sha256 aa5a25fb410d908a9c5e34c31c43987fc73ef64128f5e4fd6f6b76775c88b71d, fetched 2026-08-29. Weighted persuasive on its own disclaimer, carried on the 2022 edition and unchanged in substance: 'Affordable housing must be provided and payments in lieu must be made in a manner consistent with the Philadelphia Code and City-issued regulations and code bulletins. If this document conflicts with any adopted regulation, ordinance, or code, the adopted regulation, ordinance, or code will govern.' Sections used: Applicability and Development Bonuses (floor area 25-400 percent of lot area by district, 7 ft height in RM-1/CMX-1/CMX-2 and up to 48-60 ft in the /ECO and /CDO overlays, 25-50 percent density); How to Apply (Acknowledgement Form certified by DPD before the zoning permit; recorded deed restriction with a DPD-approved affordable building plan package before building permits; DPD certifies tenants and buyers at lease-up or point of sale); Payment Option (the $11.30/$14.60 per gross-square-foot and $13,600/$17,700 per-dwelling-unit formulas); and Affordability Standards (10 percent for 50 years, dispersal and comparable quality, the AMI definition for the Philadelphia MSA, the set household sizes of 1 person for studios and 1.5 per bedroom, the utility allowance provisions, the 100/120 percent continuing occupancy ceilings and the next-available-unit response, the 2026 gross rent and income tables with the Section 8 voucher footnote, the 70/80 percent owner-occupied limits, the resale price formula built on a 5 percent maximum down payment and a Freddie Mac average 30-year fixed rate, and the § 7-200 Right to Refusal reference for properties with four or more affordable units).

4 pages, 265,546 bytes, sha256 fc8c2f71c06237009968580c809a704fb31ca171f506f2513226cdebb5be17ec, fetched 2026-08-29. The PDF's internal CreationDate is 2026-06-03. NOT dated from the URL: the /media/20260603153842/ path segment is a directory name and is evidence of nothing, per CLAUDE.md; the published date above rests on the companion fact sheets from the same batch printing 06.03.2026 on their faces plus this document's own 2026 table headings. THIS IS THE OPERATIONAL COMPLIANCE MANUAL for both Philadelphia Mixed Income Housing programs and is the spine of the pa.philadelphia rules. Sections used: Affordability Restrictions (the Income Limits by Program table giving 40/50/60 percent at initial occupancy and 80/100/120 percent for lease renewals, and the statement that 'The deed restriction is the best way to find the applicable Area Median Income (AMI) limit'); Marketing Requirements (simultaneous completion and marketing, DPD-approved plan, the 30-day targeted outreach and its four listed strategies); Leasing Requirements (the Tenant Leasing Certification form and the full per-unit and per-adult document list, including the credit report and State-issued identification for every adult); Standard Auditing Process (Initial Certification with DPD preapproval for each unit up to three or the first three where there are four or more; self-certification thereafter; the September 15 Annual Renter Chart with current leases and the four-week early filing window; and the Three-Year Audit with its optional site visit); Determining Income and Rent Limits (the Novogradac calculator parameters, verbatim); Table 1 and Table 2 (2026 gross rent and income limits, with the Section 8 voucher footnote); and Calculating the Utility Allowance (Max Rent = Gross Rent - Utility Allowance, the PHA schedule, annual recalculation per unit type, and the tenant bearing any excess).

5 pages, 1,178,530 bytes, sha256 58a77d3687e1bdf11fe7d2338d0f50b4333c1e15d36c29c0ca968da76a86c790, fetched 2026-08-29. Sections used: the opening requirement (20 percent of residential units at 40 percent AMI for rentals and 60 percent for owner-occupied); Applicability (a Residential Housing Project is a development of 10 or more dwelling units or 20 or more sleeping units in the Overlay, excluding educational-institution housing for students or affiliated persons, developments with less than 25 percent residential gross floor area, and personal care homes); the street-boundary description of the mapped Overlay areas; How to Apply (Acknowledgement Form certified by DPD before the zoning permit, the required meeting with the applicable Registered Community Organization to share Marketing and Economic Opportunity Plans, and the recorded deed restriction before the building permit); Eligibility for the Mixed Income Housing Bonus (the two programs are calculated separately and affordable unit calculations round up); Payment-in-Lieu and Offsite Building Options (the 5 percent waiver into the Housing Trust Fund or to off-site units within a half mile, and the $9 per gross square foot and $10,900 per dwelling unit formulas); and Affordability Standards (50-year term, dispersal and comparable quality, the utility allowance provisions, the 80 percent continuing occupancy ceiling and the next-available-unit response, and the 2026 gross rent table with the Section 8 voucher footnote).