604,182 bytes, sha256 e5551514ae54b6101d9741cf31c7d0ada8a43e26639dac19d0b351c2b926ff72. The operative statement of the fee schedule the 2026 manual only points at ('See the most recent RIHousing bulletin for the current fees'): $75 per LIHTC unit in the fifteen-year compliance period, $40 per LIHTC unit in the extended use period, $100 per LIHTC unit where the owner elected the Average Income Test; billing not pro-rated, full-year from the first year of the credit period regardless of placed-in-service month. Also the operative deadline statement: Owner's Certification of Continuing Program Compliance plus Certification of Housing Tax Credit Training due in Procorem by 4PM January 31 (January 31, 2025 for certification year 2024), fee invoice payable by March 31. Per-project by 8609 line 8b: a multi-building development that answered 'No' owes one certification per BIN. The original upload path (no date directory) 404s; the 2026/01 re-upload is what resolves. Late fees are threatened but no amount is published. Republished each December; figures verified for certification year 2024 only.

13 pages, 222,835 bytes, sha256 c84a21b90712a5b02e8ba9a41f856f320531c1e4903a6fba36dd354596da2700, fetched 2026-08-29. Its cover prints 'Effective February 2019 / Version 3' and no day, so 'effective' is recorded as the first of that month and 'published' is left null; the PDF CreationDate is 2019-02-21, which is metadata and not the document's own dating. SUPERSESSION CONCERN, recorded rather than resolved: HOU-3.04, adopted 31 December 2024, cites this document as live and third in its precedence order, and the Guidelines say of themselves 'These Guidelines will be reviewed annually' -- yet the served file is six years old and still directs sponsors to inspection reports aligned to 'UPCS, HQS or city code standards', both of which HUD has since replaced with NSPIRE. Confirm the operative version with PHB before relying on any figure. Sections used: Development Phase (AFHMP required at five or more units and reapproved every five years, reserve agreements, p. 2); Occupancy Phase (99-year affordability with 20/30/55/60-year terms on pre-2018 projects, affordability runs with the land, 95 percent occupancy lease-up confirmation through WCMS, HOME six- and eighteen-month vacancy rules, management and ownership change notice, pp. 2-3); Annual Compliance Testing (the ACT workbook tabs, the 90-days-after-fiscal-year-end deadline with three worked examples, and the express exemption of MULTE, SDC and IH projects from the workbook, pp. 3-4); Tenant Compliance (most conservative restriction across funding sources, HERA Special AMI limits for pre-2009 bond and credit projects with non-HOME units, deference to OHCS over-income rules except for HOME units, the 5 percent rent increase approval policy for projects funded after August 2018, annual utility allowance models per unit type and funding source, the 80 percent scorecard threshold, pp. 4-5); Property Compliance (triennial self-inspection of 10 percent of units with one unit per building, acceptance of other funders' reports aligned to UPCS/HQS/city code, the property scorecard including PHB as additional insured, pp. 5-6); Financial Health (audited financials, reserve statements, excess cash flow invoices due 30 days, pp. 6-7).

Read 2026-08-29. Cited for the definition at (7): a "Qualified Missouri project" is "a qualified low-income building as that term is defined in section 42 of the 1986 Internal Revenue Code, as amended, which is located in Missouri". That single definition is what makes the Missouri credit a section 42 piggyback: sections 135.350 to 135.363 impose no separate occupancy standard, certification form, monitoring procedure or affordability term. Subsection (8) defines taxpayer broadly enough to reach insurance companies on gross premium receipts and chapter 148 financial institutions, which is why the credit has a wide transferee market.

Read 2026-08-29. Subsection 1 makes the eligibility statement a condition of allowance -- no credit for the year until it is provided to the Department of Revenue. Subsection 2 is the recapture provision and it is narrower than most: it reaches federal recapture required "only during the first ten years after a project is placed in service", FIVE YEARS SHORTER than the federal fifteen-year compliance period, and states no independent state trigger. The section's face carries a cross-reference to the Tax Credit Accountability Act of 2004 at §§ 135.800 to 135.830, which imposes separate three-year post-issuance reporting not encoded in this pass.

Read 2026-08-29. Subsection 1 permits transfer, sale or assignment of all or any portion of the credit to parties eligible under § 135.352.1; subsection 2 requires the owner or transferee to file a statement with the Director of Revenue describing the amount eligible for transfer; subsection 3 requires that, where recapture is required under § 135.355.2, the statement identify the transferees subject to recapture and the amounts previously transferred. The corpus records an open question on the exact enumeration in subsection 3, which was read on the page but not captured verbatim in full.

Subsections (1) and (2) omit disability from the class list.

South Dakota adds creed and ancestry, binds fiduciaries acting under court order, deed of trust or will, and frames the advertising prohibition around communicating that a group is 'unwelcome, objectionable, not acceptable, or not solicited'.

Fetched for one purpose: to establish the effective date of Chapter 122E from the document's own face rather than inferring it. Sec. 6 reads 'This act is effective upon ratification' and the enrolling clause records ratification on 14 August 1987. Every Trust Fund section cited in this batch carries the (1987, c. 841, s. 1.) credit.

15 pages, 1,586,632 bytes, sha256 683440eb5032386c047da2f80b2e4bffd9eaf3f15c28248ac63c070b68886fcd, fetched 2026-08-29. Date off the cover. S.M.A.R.T. stands for Safe, Mixed-Income, Accessible, Reasonably-Priced, Transit-Oriented. It buys FEE WAIVERS rather than height: 10% of units reasonably priced buys a 25% waiver, 20% buys 50%, 30% buys 75%, 40% buys 100%. Its affordability commitment is the shortest in this corpus -- rental units reasonably priced for a MINIMUM OF FIVE YEARS, ownership units at the point of initial sale only -- and the guide notes the consequence: S.M.A.R.T. Housing does not qualify units for the street impact fee reduction under Land Development Code 25-6-668 'due to its lower affordability commitments', which requires 60% MFI for 40 years rental or 80% for 99 years ownership. Two provisions worth recording that appear nowhere else: 'Households that comply with other federal, state, or local income eligibility standards, such as the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program, also are considered to meet S.M.A.R.T. Housing reasonably priced standards'; and decertification requires repayment of ALL waived fees before the project may proceed to the next stage of development approval. The guide names the geography as the 'Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos metropolitan statistical area' where every other Austin document read this pass says 'Austin-Round Rock'. It also carries accessibility standards that exceed the Fair Housing Act and Texas Accessibility Standards (Type A accessibility in at least 10% of units in developments of four or more), and Austin Energy Green Building requirements, neither of which is modelled in this corpus.

6 pages, 152,021 bytes, sha256 5165a4abfb63faf17810cb2d91891648f230775d86520dfc9ad335e39d7afd0b, fetched 2026-08-30. Its first page carries a banner in capitals: 'THIS IS A SAMPLE DOCUMENT. THIS MAY NOT REPRESENT A FINAL FORM OF DOCUMENT. THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE ALL DOCUMENTS AT ANY TIME.' Its date line reads 'as of __________ ___ , 2024' -- a year with no month or day -- so `published` is null. Terms used here: section 1(a) defines the Period of Affordability as THIRTY years from the date of the agreement; section 2 restricts the project to a single-family residence for households at or below 80 percent of area median, requires resale to a first-time homebuyer at or below 80 percent AMI 'for a purchase price of no more than $342,000', and bars transfer, conveyance or lease without the City's prior written consent; section 3 makes the covenants run with the land; section 4 gives the City a right of first refusal and purchase agreement under the loan fund agreement; section 6 gives a SIXTY-DAY correction period running from when any party learned or should have learned of the failure by reasonable diligence -- the only cure period in any Charlotte instrument located this pass; section 7 gives the City specific performance, injunctive relief and monetary damages; and section 8 requires recording in the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds.

1 page, 273,076 bytes, sha256 d2eac2696e0440354a29ff3351d54ea8ae42d4eaca32e2095120ea8ae0137292, fetched 2026-08-30. The face carries the single date '4/1/2026' beside the header 'San Diego Housing Commission / Apartment Building'; the document does not say whether that is an issue date or an effective date, and prints no expiry, so neither `published` nor `effective` is asserted. Allowances by bedroom count 0 through 5 for space heating (natural gas or electric), cooking (natural gas or electric), other electric, water heating (natural gas or electric), water, sewer, trash by container size, range/microwave and refrigerator, plus a worked 2-BR example totalling $131. The PDF is a print of an xlsm whose internal title is '3-17-26 Utility_Model-Ver13i_813_Summit-Updated (9).xlsm'. NO SCHEDULE FOR ANY STRUCTURE TYPE OTHER THAN AN APARTMENT BUILDING WAS LOCATED, though SDMC 142.1307 lets an inclusionary obligation be met with SRO hotel rooms.

1 page, 103,016 bytes, sha256 e575ca65d7b0a2d2f977ca69ede0486d08cd3b212e838d939dfea38eb31d1132, fetched 2026-08-30. Both dates are printed on the document's own face at the foot: 'Effective 05/1/2026' and 'Revised 05/22/2026'. Header: 'U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development / 2026 San Diego Median Income: $130,900' with the asterisked note '*Income Limits 80% and Below are Based on HUD Formula Income Limits Adjusted for High Housing Cost Area'. Twelve income bands by family size one to eight. The income figures are identical to the income columns of the Income and Rent Calculations chart; this sheet carries no rents.

5 pages, 192,839 bytes, sha256 971e4778057980e574d39f877e9f9b8d13d0c93d53819f607c38d84730889637, fetched 2026-08-30. NO DATE ON ITS FACE; PDF CreationDate and ModDate are both 8 February 2019 and the URL segment is the upload directory. Tick-boxes for Initial, Quarter and Annual. Reports set-aside, occupied and held-vacant unit counts by income band, separately for HOME units, and carries six owner certifications: continuous compliance with the affordability provisions of the Loan Agreement; occupancy by or availability to eligible tenants; rents within the limits prescribed by the Agreement; tenant incomes reviewed, verified and within the qualifying limits; no default; and truth of the representations. Requires an attached occupancy report listing per unit the unit number or address, tenant name, number of occupants, annual income, move-in date and monthly rent. The form's 'Loan Agreement' framing and HOME lines suggest it was drafted for SDHC's lending programmes and is used across the whole monitored portfolio; no inclusionary-only form was located.

1 page, 146,864 bytes, sha256 571069afa322405823e533d510211be42279726ce6011b2e205d7e0e3f991364, fetched 2026-08-30. NO DATE APPEARS ANYWHERE ON THE DOCUMENT. Its PDF CreationDate is 5 December 2022 and ModDate 11 January 2023; the '2023/01' URL segment is the upload directory. Neither is on the face and neither is recorded as the publication date. It states the annual fee as $157.50 per monitored unit, a $100 hourly charge for high-volume monitoring at SDHC's sole discretion, a ratchet ('In no event shall the monitoring fee decrease') and a HOME carve-out. IT DISAGREES WITH EXHIBIT D OF THE PROCEDURES MANUAL, which states $150 per unit and a $2,500 initial fee; this schedule states no initial fee at all.

1 page, 131,711 bytes (the raw response body), sha256 f5f93bfc723a46682ccd2cb3ae5320bd2519f8db43814cc2cc5c8cb71109541d, fetched 2026-08-30. Dates are off the document's own face: 'Revised:05/28/2026:ib' at the foot, and 'derived from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development very low income figures effective May 1, 2026. HOME Rents effective June 1, 2026.' THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SAN DIEGO DOCUMENT IN THE CORPUS. It carries, for family sizes one through eight and unit sizes studio through 6-BR, the annual income and GROSS RENT at 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 65, 70, 80, 100, 110 and 120 percent of the $130,900 2026 San Diego median -- and, at every band up to 65 percent, a SECOND rent column headed 'TCAC' computed on the section 42 convention of 1.5 persons per bedroom, plus Low HOME and High HOME columns. The City column and the TCAC column disagree at every bedroom count and the sign flips at the 2-BR/3-BR boundary: at 60 percent a 1-BR is $2,100 City against $1,968 TCAC, a 3-BR is $2,624 City against $2,728 TCAC, a 5-BR is $3,044 City against $3,358 TCAC. Footnote 3 states the resolution rule for a layered property ('use the lowest rents applicable') and a closing note warns that the chart 'may not be applicable to projects financed with Section 42 Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) or section 142 tax exempt private equity bonds (MTSP)' because of HERA.

2 pages, 201,120 bytes, sha256 b582259d8dd641b3c470808578ea03a1afdae270bc20170e674d10f1884c7042, fetched 2026-08-30. The only self-dating on the document is the footer 'Rev 10-2024', a month and year with no day, so no `published` date is asserted rather than inventing one; the '2024/01' URL segment contradicts the footer and is an upload directory. Collects household composition with dates of birth, SSN/TIN, full-time student flag and employment flag; assets with net cash value and actual income, imputing at a 0.81 percent passbook rate where net cash value exceeds $5,000; gross annual income by member across employment, Social Security and pensions, public assistance, other income and asset income; the section 42 full-time-student household question with the married-filing-jointly exception; and whether the household receives Section 8 or other assistance. Tick-boxes at the head distinguish Initial Certification from Annual Recertification. THE ASSET MECHANIC IS PRE-HOTMA ($5,000 imputation threshold, not the $50,000 self-certification threshold) on a form revised after HOTMA's final rule.

19 pages, 277,038 bytes, sha256 5cfa808d9775732326fa527036ab405f60aeeaab1e4396d91cc090718ea66274, fetched 2026-08-30. NO PUBLICATION DATE IS RECORDED because the document prints none: every page carries only the currency stamp '(7-2026)', which is a month-year and is the codifier's currency marker rather than a date of adoption or effect. The operative dates are per section and are printed in each section's own amendment history, which is why the rules sourced here take their effective.from from those histories. Sections used: 142.1302 (applicability thresholds and the non-cumulative / more-restrictive clause); 142.1303(c) (density bonus exemption); 142.1304(a) (10 percent rental at 30 percent of 60 percent of median including a utility allowance), (c) (combinations), (e)(1)-(e)(5) (concurrency, comparability, the CTCAC opportunity area preference, the off-site deed restriction and 54/36-month foreclosure triggers), (f) (55 years from final inspection), (g) (for-sale equity share); 142.1305 (methods of compliance, including the High/Highest Resource receiver-site test); 142.1306 ($25.00 per square foot In Lieu Fee, CCI escalation, vesting at deemed-complete); 142.1307(f) (55 years for rehabilitation and SRO conversion); 142.1312(a) (SDHC CEO determines affordability standards and occupant qualifications); 142.1313 (Declaration recorded in first lien position secured by a deed of trust); 142.1314 (SDHC's annual report to Council); 142.1315 (findings for denial, added 6-15-2026 by O-22109 N.S. effective 7-15-2026). Editor's notes record that the O-21836 and O-22109 amendments do not apply within the Coastal Overlay Zone until the California Coastal Commission certifies a Local Coastal Program Amendment, so two texts are in force in different parts of the City.

42 pages, 595,223 bytes, sha256 1915f217e2b6083e5d49c1d01b586b0d5b83e85810a1b33e9d8a9f849d6b198a, fetched 2026-08-30. No publication date on its face; only the '(7-2026)' currency stamp. Sections read in full this pass: 143.0720 (a)-(d) -- the SDHC CEO agreement and deed of trust, the inclusionary exemption, and the rental and for-sale qualifying criteria including the 30 percent of 50 percent and 30 percent of 60 percent rental bands 'as adjusted for household size appropriate for the dwelling unit', dispersal, and the 55-year term -- plus 143.0750, 143.0755 and 143.0765. Subsections 143.0720(e) through (i) (senior, transitional foster youth / disabled veteran / homeless, student housing, mobilehome park) and sections 143.0717, 143.0730, 143.0740 - 143.0749, 143.0760 were NOT read in full. O-22109 N.S. carries the same Coastal Overlay Zone editor's note as Division 13.

Sections read in full this pass: 5.08.105 (Affordable housing cost, including the four carve-outs); 5.08.107, .110, .115, .120, .125 (definitions of Affordable Housing Developer, Affordable Housing Development, Siting Policy, Plan, Applicant); 5.08.130 (Area Median Income = Santa Clara County median at 25 CCR 6932); 5.08.180-.185, .200, .210-.227, .265, .270 (income category and Regulations definitions); 5.08.300 (Operative Date); 5.08.310 (Applicability); 5.08.320 (Exemptions, including the 20-unit threshold); 5.08.400 (the on-site requirement and the 30 du/acre alternatives) and 5.08.410 (fractional units); 5.08.460 (timing of construction); 5.08.470 (standards for inclusionary units); 5.08.480 (minimum requirements); 5.08.520 (in lieu fee) and 5.08.525 (mixed compliance); 5.08.600 (continuing affordability and initial occupancy); 5.08.610 (Affordable Housing Plan and Inclusionary Housing Agreement); 5.08.620; 5.08.700 (Inclusionary Fee Fund); 5.08.710 (monitoring of compliance); 5.08.730 (implementation and enforcement); 5.08.740 (transition period). NOT read in full: 5.08.510 (off-site construction), 5.08.530 (dedication of land), 5.08.540 (credits and transfers), 5.08.550 (acquisition and rehabilitation), 5.08.560 (HUD restricted units), 5.08.570, 5.08.580 (option to purchase), 5.08.590 (partnership for clustered units), 5.08.720 (waiver). No rule here is sourced to a section that was not read. NO PUBLICATION DATE IS TAKEN FROM A URL: the 2021 and 2026 dates come from the chapter's own editor's note and from SJMC 5.08.740, which recite them.

Downloaded via plain curl with a standard browser User-Agent from schousing.sc.gov's document library (schousing.com itself returns a WAF 403 challenge to automated fetch, but links out to this state-government mirror which serves the same document without a challenge). 81 pages, 1,124,710 bytes, sha256 3c113f780a0b50b9202c6bc53fe9e087368043090cf1c400bff3531bddcdfb79. The 2026 LIHTC QAP and the Multiple Program Compliance Guidebook (rev. 02.12.2026) were also read for cross-reference but not separately cited -- the Compliance Manual restates and is more specific on every checklist item this pass covers. Confirmed reachable 2026-08-27 despite the archiver reporting it unreachable: plain curl with a standard browser User-Agent. The URL is correct; the fetch was being blocked. Archiver's connection reset was transient. Keep the URL. Note the record's own caveat still holds and is worth preserving: schousing.com (the .com host) returns a WAF 403 challenge to automated fetch, while this schousing.sc.gov state-government path serves the same document without a challenge. Do not let anyone "normalise" the URL to the .com host.

65 pages, 846,369 bytes, sha256 4109fe47a78a176a84e0c53e94110d116bb2d21c44a5ab1d54659c1e50b34800. Established as current from the SDHDA Housing Tax Credits program page and its own cover ('As approved by the SDHDA Board of Commissioners, June 15, 2026'). Cited for sec. I.P (owners must comply with the compliance manual, incorporated by reference; 'SDHDA must approve any transfer of ownership'), sec. II (the Qualified Contract Option 'will not be allowed for any project receiving a tax credit reservation', including bond-financed 142(d) projects), the Monitoring section sec. D ($50 per development + $30 per low-income unit annual fee, bond projects included, payable through the extended use period starting after the first full year in service), and sec. I of the underwriting standards (replacement reserve minimum $400/unit/yr trended 3% annually for the entire extended use period, account remains with the project through a transfer of ownership). Biennial document: a 2028-2029 QAP should be expected around mid-2028.

37 pages, 448,605 bytes, sha256 aadcfed96a772e457c673d51c96172149b94627b51da2d70214a74a566906722. Twenty-two years old but current in the only sense available: it is the sole edition SDHDA publishes, it is linked from the current Housing Tax Credits program page, and the September 2024 compliance manual's Qualified Contracts section directs readers to it by name. Cited for the qualified-contract process where a project's LURA still permits one: SDHDA reviews recorded declarations and 8609s annually and notifies owners by the December before their 14th year of the options available; the application packet carries a $1,000 application fee and a CPA-verified Qualified Contract Price; SDHDA then has a one-year period, commencing on a date SDHDA confirms by letter, to find a buyer, and if none is found the development may convert to market rate subject to the three-year tenant decontrol protections. Given its age, every figure in it (especially the $1,000 fee) should be reconfirmed with SDHDA before reliance.

Fetched 2026-08-27; page text confirmed to open '§794. Nondiscrimination under Federal grants and programs'.