DATE TAKEN FROM THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: every page footer reads 'form HUD-52648 (01/2024) / Previous edition is obsolete / ref. 24 CFR Part 985'; the OMB block reads 'OMB Approval No. 2577-0215 (exp. 12/31/2026)'. There is no separate issue date printed, so 'published' is left null rather than inferred from '01/2024' - that string is the form edition, and the corpus does not treat an edition stamp as a publication date. This is the reporting instrument for the SEMAP taxonomy, the voucher-program analogue of IRS Form 8823: 14 numbered performance indicators (indicator 14 split into 14a and 14b) plus an optional Deconcentration Bonus Indicator addendum. THE FORM AND THE REGULATION DISAGREE IN TWO PLACES, both recorded on the affected violation records: (1) indicator 2 on the form says rent reasonableness must be redetermined 'at the HAP contract anniversary if there is a 5 percent decrease in the published FMR', while 24 CFR 985.3(b)(1) says 10 percent; (2) the form gates indicators 1-7 on whether 'the PHA expends less than $300,000 a year in Federal awards', while 24 CFR 985.3 now says 'less than its Federal award expenditure threshold in 2 CFR part 200, subpart F'. The form also carries no counterpart to the success-rate indicator at 24 CFR 985.3(p).

Subparts A, D and E carry the Moderate Rehabilitation program proper; subpart H is the separate Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy Program for Homeless Individuals, which the corpus has no program_id for. 882.511 currently carries the eCFR notation 'Link to an amendment published at 91 FR 9453, Feb. 26, 2026. Link to a delay of the above amendment published at 91 FR 12301, Mar. 13, 2026.' - the revocation of the 30-day nonpayment notice requirement, whose effective date HUD delayed indefinitely on 13 March 2026.

HUD's own orientation guide for 811 PRA grantees. Cited for three things stated nowhere else that is reachable: that HUD has issued no programme regulations for 811 PRA ('HUD has not issued program regulations for the PRA program, but there are a number of key public documents that outline the PRA program requirements'); that Handbook 4350.3 governs occupancy ('Generally, HUD Handbook 4350.3 Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs applies to the PRA program'); and the tenant eligibility criteria, including the 18-to-under-62 age range at move-in, the target population, and eligibility for community-based long-term care services under the Interagency Partnership Agreement. IT DISCLAIMS ITS OWN COMPLETENESS -- 'The Start-Up Guide is not a comprehensive guide to all PRA requirements' -- and points at the binding documents: the NOFA the grantee was funded under (FY12, FY13/14 or FY19) and Exhibit 5 (Program Guidelines) of that grantee's Cooperative Agreement, which the guide's own table describes as serving 'as regulations for the program'. Programme requirements DIFFER BY NOFA YEAR, so a property-specific question has to be answered from its own Cooperative Agreement, not from here. authority_weight is deliberately persuasive rather than binding for that reason.

5 pages, 811,183 bytes, sha256 74b0c75690189f0a2658fad8b1bf0c31ffc908415a41cfec1908f534115bad0b, fetched 2026-08-31. The Director of Housing's exercise of the power Sec. 12.1.7(c)(i) confers. Recites its own authority and the underlying obligation -- 'Per Section 12.1.7 of the Somerville Zoning Ordinance, residential developments with thirty (30) or more units are required to provide 20% of the obligated ADUs as three-bedroom units' -- and sets a 1,000 square foot target size for a three-bedroom ADU with a stated measurement convention (inside face of bounding walls, including usable storage, interior stairwells and hallways and interior walls, and 50 percent of the area under sloped ceilings between 5'0" and 7'6" clearance), a 100 square foot unobstructed minimum for bedrooms, and layout requirements including direct natural light to bedrooms and living/dining areas and furniture plans demonstrating efficient layout. Says the standards are enforced by the review boards 'as a condition of discretional or administrative permits'. Its example layout is credited to DHCD's Massachusetts Multifamily New Construction Design Requirements, which is a state document not held in this corpus.

5 pages, 1,006,037 bytes, sha256 a6f694d64a2a61c405c46db35c54370ec16192f6f4bc16ca5465bbaabcbf270f, fetched 2026-08-31; dated 17 July 2025 on its letterhead, PDF authored 2025-07-18, filename 'IZ FY 2024 Annual Report 7.18.25'. The best single description of how the programme actually runs: the 1990 origin; 'currently, 20% of all units in most developments of 4+ units must be affordable'; the four affordability levels and their tier names (rental tiers 1/2/3 at 50/80/110 percent AMI; ownership tiers 1/2/3 at 80/110/140 percent); the designation of units, their sizes, affordability levels and amenity access in an AHIP and an Affordable Housing Restriction recorded at the Middlesex Registry of Deeds; an inventory as at 1 July 2024 of 425 rental and 129 homeownership units in projects with all residential certificates of occupancy, broken out by bedroom count and AMI band, representing nearly 15 percent of the City's total affordable stock; 127 units marketed in FY24, of which 120 across four projects were marketed by third parties retained by the developers and seven by City staff; a pipeline defined as projects with a signed AHIP, which fell from 240 to 160 units; the selection of Emphasys Software as the CRW database vendor; live telephonic interpretation for limited-English-proficient households; and three policies enacted in FY24 -- voucher holders admitted to 110 percent AMI waitlists, Somerville Preference split into two tiers with a schoolchild qualifying for tier 1, and early-lease-termination fees limited to one month's rent or waived outright in named circumstances.

2 pages, 346,689 bytes, sha256 e4e3d98915450bcc9fe5dadde0b71afc0589953eb78a1cf8682aa48389d9326c, fetched 2026-08-31. The instrument by which a project's utility allowance is fixed. Requires 'complete information on all initial utilities that will be paid by the tenant and owner of the development', broken out into electricity, heating, water, sewer, water heating and cooking, each with a tenant/owner box and, where applicable, a fuel type (natural gas, electric, oil, coal or other); requires a submetering water and sewer certification form to be attached where the tenant pays water or sewer; captures the development name and the Initial Rental Year Start Date; and states the building classification convention that drives which Somerville Housing Authority allowance column applies -- 'developments that consist of four floors or more with an elevator are classified to be a high rise with an elevator. Any building with 3 floors or more without an elevator would be classified as a low rise. A building with three floors and an elevator would be classified as a low rise.' Closes with the operative ongoing duty: 'Any changes after the initial year to utility charges must be approved by OSPCD's Housing Division.'

Sec. 12.1 as fetched: 51,807 bytes of HTML, sha256 890551659d2426c5fec69b5698ada3b252f26c5d07f070c4ef71fcb4611f5210, fetched 2026-08-31. CURRENCY WAS ESTABLISHED FROM THE CODIFIER'S OWN AMENDMENT HISTORY TABLE (secid=920, 40,893 bytes, sha256 ce66bc5eec2218dd2d76e16491304b604580331ec1a7d8d8a5a1c43a84459466), which states it records every amending ordinance 'from January 2023-present' and whose last rows are Ord. 2026-03 adopted 5/14/2026 (Affordable Housing, amending Secs. 8.1.2 and 8.1.6 -- the overlay district, NOT Sec. 12.1) and Ord. 2026-05 adopted 6/25/2026 (Building Components, Secs. 3.1.13 and 3.2.12). So the codification is current to at least late June 2026 and nothing since December 2024 has touched Sec. 12.1. NOT DATED FROM A URL: the adoption date of the ordinance comes from the City's own developer page, which calls it 'Section 12 of the December 12, 2019 zoning ordinance', and each subsection's amendment stamp comes from the codified page itself. Sections read in full and used: 12.1.1 Purpose; 12.1.2 Applicability incl. the anti-segmentation rule and the educational-institution exemption; 12.1.3 Enforcement; 12.1.4 Required ADUs; 12.1.5 ADU Price incl. Table 12.1.5(a) tier sequence, Table 12.1.5(b) rental multipliers and Table 12.1.5(c) ownership multipliers; 12.1.6 Purchase & Tenancy Standards incl. Tables 12.1.6(a) and (b) income multipliers, the City's right of first refusal and the perpetuity clause; 12.1.7 ADU Development Standards; 12.1.8 Legal Agreements; 12.1.9 Compliance; 12.1.10 Performance Review; 12.3.1, 12.3.2, 12.3.6 ADU Fractional Buyouts and 12.3.7 ADU In-Lieu Payments. TWO DEFECTS ON THE FACE OF THE ORDINANCE, reproduced rather than corrected: the worked example at 12.1.5(c)(ii)(a) calls $113,300 'the 2019 MFI' while the parallel example at 12.1.5(d)(ii)(a) calls the same figure 'the 2018 MFI'; and Table 12.1.6(b) gives Ownership Tier 2 the value 110% at BOTH the 5-person and 6-person household sizes, breaking the +11-point arithmetic every other row follows, where 121% would fall. Neither is an artefact of the fetch.

Read 2026-08-31. THE SET-ASIDE PERCENTAGE IS NOT IN ARTICLE 12. Sec. 12.1.4(a) says ADUs 'must be provided as specified in Article 3: Residential Districts, Article 4: Mid-Rise Districts, Article 5: High-Rise Districts, Article 7: Special Districts, and Article 8: Overlay Districts', and the number itself lives in a per-building-type table in each of those articles. Fifteen such tables were located and read; FOURTEEN give '20% of units' and differ only in the threshold row. The dominant form, carried by every mid-rise and high-rise building type and by the Residence-district apartment building, is '0 to 3 units: None / 4 or more units: 20% of units'. Three older Residence-district tables state a BOUNDED band instead and have never been amended: Table 3.2.8 '4 to 6 units: 20% of units', Table 3.2.9 (Apartment House) '4 to 10 units: 20% of units' and Table 3.2.11 (Row Houses) '4 to 10 units: 20% of units'. Those bands have no upper row, so what a 12-unit apartment house owes is not stated by the table -- recorded as a conflict in the Somerville set-aside rule rather than resolved. Table 7.4.11 carries a stray footnote marker in its header ('Total Dwelling Units 1Required ADUs') which is a typographical defect in the codification.

Read 2026-08-29. Cited for (A)(4), the state's own "project" definition reciting the pre-2018 federal 40-60 and 20-50 set-asides and omitting the average income test -- recorded with an open question rather than resolved; (A)(5), defining a qualified project as a section 42 qualified low-income building approved by SC Housing; (B)(1), the placed-in-service window running from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2030 with the credit capped at the federal credit; (B)(2)(a)-(b), recapture proportional to federal recapture and the return content required to report it; (B)(4), allocation of the credit AND of any recaptured credit among partners in any manner agreed regardless of the federal allocation; (B)(5)(a), the supplement-not-supplant limit; and (C)(1)-(2), the eligibility statement and the tenant-benefit report that gates its issuance. RECORDED ABSENCE: a full-text search of the section returned no occurrence of transfer, assign, sell, sold or sale -- on the text as read this is not a certificated transferable credit.

1 page, 1,483,719 bytes, sha256 a301164aee02fd1badcce25f67019568208f88fb1e07af427659b491b81662b4. Fetched 2026-08-28 by curl -sL with a desktop Chrome User-Agent (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126 Safari/537.36). HTTP 200 first attempt, no bot wall. 'For households whose combined net assets do not exceed the applicable Imputed Income Limitation.' Four parts - two-year disposals below fair market value; a federal tax return or refundable federal tax credit in the last 12 months; Non-necessary Personal Property split into account-based and non-account-based; and Real Property with its own cash value and income columns. Prints no figure of its own: the figure is on the companion Worksheet. Identical in substance to Vermont's 2024 Asset Self-Certification, which is a .docx with the same four parts.

1 page, 1,669,893 bytes, sha256 e4014cb37a751d6c53cde007a83d7d285e7542b18923b697fb14d09fc94ecc4e. Fetched 2026-08-28 by curl -sL with a desktop Chrome User-Agent (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126 Safari/537.36). HTTP 200 first attempt, no bot wall. THE ONLY SOUTH DAKOTA DOCUMENT THAT PRINTS THE INFLATION-ADJUSTED ASSET THRESHOLD, and it prints it in a small box at the foot of the page: 'Imputed Income Limitation / FY 2024: $50,000 / FY 2025: $51,600'. The 43-page compliance manual says only '$50,000, as adjusted by inflation'. This is the sixth instance in this corpus of an agency putting its operative figure in printed structure rather than in prose. It is also the operative decision procedure: Part I for a family with NNPP and no real property, Part II where there is both, each ending 'Is the value ... less than or equal to $____ / If NO, the Asset Self Certification cannot be used, and each asset must be separately verified', with line (7) or line (13) carrying the asset income figure to Part IVA line (F) of the TIC. THOSE ARE THE LINE NUMBERS VERMONT'S TIC INSTRUCTIONS CITE while VHFA publishes no worksheet. NOTE THE GAP: the published series stops at FY 2025; no FY 2026 figure was located on sdhousing.org as at 2026-08-28, and none is inferred.

1 page, 652,495 bytes, sha256 04b4a83c961b88562c0a13b4c25096aad4c70f0e741378582785d939e7bf0ea2. Fetched 2026-08-28 by curl -sL with a desktop Chrome User-Agent (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126 Safari/537.36). HTTP 200 first attempt, no bot wall. The manual names this form as the 'Under $50,000 Asset Verification' and states it is 'only applicable to the HTC program'; the form's own header reads 'HOME | HTF | HTC' and its subtitle adds 'Form cannot be used for HOME/HTF at move-in' - a restriction that appears on the form and in no SDH manual. TWO FINDINGS. (1) Its Part 3 defines the operative term by a dead regulation: 'The net family assets (as defined in 24 CFR 813.102) above do not exceed $50,000' - part 813 was removed from the CFR in 1996 and net family assets have been at 24 CFR 5.603 since, rewritten by HOTMA effective 1 January 2024, the month before this revision. Vermont's 2019 Under $5,000 form carries the identical citation. (2) It overlaps and does not match the Asset Self-Certification and its Worksheet: this form has an interest-rate column and one total, the other separates NNPP from real property and subtracts federal tax refunds. SDH publishes both and does not say which to use.

2 pages, 874,027 bytes, sha256 dca04f0eb29d89bcd4f0e5daa4d01d7118b41610e8c67eda2b753e7dee476ae9. Fetched 2026-08-28 by curl -sL with a desktop Chrome User-Agent (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126 Safari/537.36). HTTP 200 first attempt, no bot wall. The annual tenant-side student certification: three exclusive boxes, the middle one carrying 'Verification of part-time student status is required for at least one occupant', and five exception questions each naming its own attachment. WORD FOR WORD THE SAME FORM VERMONT PUBLISHES as Student-Self-Certification-Form-FINAL-2024.pdf. It names WIOA where SDH's own manual still names the repealed Workforce Investment Act. Signed by all members aged 18 or older with an undertaking to notify management immediately of any change in student status.

1 page, 965,018 bytes, sha256 ec239069bed37014b55e842d7f4a1c09543e693740d8f08c69de806afc62c8b0. Fetched 2026-08-28 by curl -sL with a desktop Chrome User-Agent (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126 Safari/537.36). HTTP 200 first attempt, no bot wall. The THIRD-PARTY half of South Dakota's student regime, and the instrument that makes the manual's 'Part-time student status should be verified with the educational institution' operable: it is completed by management, executed by the student as a release, and sent to the named educational institution, which returns full-time or part-time status MONTH BY MONTH across the calendar year, the cost of tuition and required fees per term, the number of terms attended, and financial aid split into amounts received under section 479B of the HEA and other grants or scholarships. The consent is limited to information no older than 12 months, with a separate consent required to reach back up to five years. VERMONT PUBLISHES NO EQUIVALENT: its Forms & Documents page carries only tenant self-certifications, so an owner following Vermont's own requirement to third-party verify part-time status has no VHFA form for it.

43 pages, 527,315 bytes, sha256 9d9726fec5cacd656a3b2c7bfc6ccf7aedc94c8f14f69115fd0a6de00df31a3b. THIS IS THE CURRENT EDITION AND IT IS NOT THE FIRST SEARCH HIT: search prefers a Novoco mirror of the July 2019 edition. South Dakota Housing's own Housing Tax Credits program page links exactly one compliance manual and this is it. Three dates disagree on its face - link filename 2025HTC.pdf, cover 'July 2024', every page footer 'September 2024' - the cover/footer dates are treated as the edition and the filename as a posting label. Content confirms currency over the 2019 mirror: HOTMA verification updates, NSPIRE as the physical inspection criteria, NextGen as the reporting portal. Internally inconsistent on two points (owner certificate certifies to UPCS while the inspection section uses NSPIRE; first-review timing stated as both 'end of the calendar year following' and 'end of the second year after' placed in service) - both conflicts are carried on the affected rules as open questions. The 2026-2027 QAP sec. I.P incorporates this manual by reference. No standalone utility-allowance policy exists - UA procedure is inside this manual, and the agency-estimate method 'is not offered by SDH'.

7 pages, 1,295,479 bytes, sha256 fc636822783799082076adc40dc9df4bc7e630a80df4b24935df48b7a65681ad. Fetched 2026-08-28 by curl -sL with a desktop Chrome User-Agent (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126 Safari/537.36). HTTP 200 first attempt, no bot wall. Published on SDH's HTC Program Management Forms and Resources page at /manage-housing/forms-resources/htc-program-management-forms-resources. SUBSTANTIVELY IDENTICAL TO VERMONT'S 2024 TIC - the same Parts IVA and IVB, the same 'Imputed Income Limitation' branch, the same instruction columns. The two states have adopted the same 2024 model form suite. The difference that matters is downstream: South Dakota also publishes the Asset Self-Certification Worksheet the instructions point at, and Vermont does not, which is why one state has a threshold figure on file and the other has none. The url filename carries no year; the edition is taken from the page footers.

Linked under Recommended Tenant Forms at https://spectrumlihtc.com/state-monitoring/delaware/ on September 13, 2026. Asset Forms/Asset Self-Certification with Worksheet-5-2025.pdf, page 2, identifies applicable Imputed Income Limitation and separate FY 2024 and FY 2025 amounts. Package inclusion does not make every bundled form mandatory.

1 page, 117,268 bytes, sha256 8a60dd8e80fc273a88666ac2f4a1e7a518f1d76ef57be5e8b9a9825ee500021e. Fetched 2026-08-28 by plain curl with a desktop Chrome User-Agent from the same Spectrum Connecticut state-monitoring page that serves TC-100H. THE DOCUMENT'S OWN FACE: the title line reads 'UNDER $5,000 ASSET CERTIFICATION', the subtitle 'For households whose combined net assets are less than $5,000.00', and the only date-like mark is the footer copyright 'SPECTRUM ENTERPRISES 2021' -- a year with no month, so `published` is left null. CITED AS A LIVE CONFLICT, NOT AS AUTHORITY. Its substance is pre-HOTMA throughout: it asks for an 'Average 6 mo checking acct balance' (HOTMA replaced the six-statement average with one current-balance statement), it counts '401k/IRA' and 'Stocks/Bonds/Retirement' as assets (HOTMA excludes IRS-recognised retirement accounts from net family assets), and its threshold is $5,000 rather than the indexed imputed income limitation. It is served simultaneously with, and from the same page as, the HOTMA-era TC-100H, and neither CHFA's manual nor the forms page states which of the two governs. That absence is recorded as an open question on the rule that cites it, not resolved. `superseded` is deliberately NOT set: nothing on CHFA's or Spectrum's face says this form is withdrawn, and the corpus does not invent a supersession date.

2 pages, 153,375 bytes, sha256 193e8ef685d753b907459f92e8ce7ab6e99446ebbd95a674609a65f887538b4f. Fetched with plain curl and a standard browser User-Agent; no bot wall. The Unit History Report channel: Spectrum EOY software v7.0, collection opening March 1, 2026, final submission April 30, 2026, paper copies not acceptable, untimely submissions may result in Form 8823. Spectrum's WV page confirms it acts as authorized delegate for WVHDF across LIHTC, HOME, HTF and RD538.

The delegated monitor's own statement of scope: 'Spectrum performs compliance monitoring for the Development Bank of American Samoa (DBAS) for their 1602 Tax Credit Exchange Program portfolio.' Lists four forms 'unique to American Samoa' - Application for Housing (Household Eligibility Questionnaire), Certification of Zero Income, Re-certification Update, and the Spectrum/HUD Tenant Income Certification - and directs owners to upload files via Spectrum's secure portal. Weighted persuasive rather than binding because Spectrum is the contractor, not the Authority; the binding statements are DBAS's own certificate and page. Corroborates both the agency identification and the existence of an active recertification cycle on the portfolio.

Observed September 13, 2026. Required LIHTC/HMMF forms distinguish the PRE HOTMA HHFDC TIC from the HOTMA TIC revised September 2024. Recommended forms include the HOTMA asset self-certification revised August 2025. This listing establishes availability and labels, not a new legal effective date.

THE California HOME source. 25 CCR 8200(b) states that the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act provides for state administration of the HOME program and that these regulations govern 'the department's management of these funds' -- the department being HCD, not the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee, which allocates and monitors Housing Credits from the State Treasurer's office and does not administer HOME. Section 8208 carries the affordability and rent restrictions, section 8212.2 incorporates most of the Uniform Multifamily Regulations into the HOME program by reference, section 8214 requires the recorded legal documents, and section 8216 carries the reporting and recordkeeping duties. An earlier printing of the same subchapter dated 10/10/12 is also still served at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-funding/active-funding/cdbg/docs/state_home_regulations_10-10-12.pdf; it is superseded by this edition, which adds the 50-year Native American Lands term at 8208(a) and 'Developers' to the filers at 8216(a)(3). Editorial correction 2026-09-13: agency_id now identifies the issuing Department of Housing and Community Development (ca.hcd), replacing the tax-credit agency placeholder (ca.hfa). Document identity, legal dates and scope are unchanged.

66 pages, 1,806,734 bytes, sha256 b1a276d3bd3bd63272aaaa5c6b8dd455d0c61f7d9b5cc70a398c8f797643ae6a. Linked from DSHA's LIHTC page as '2025 - 2026 QAP'; an earlier printing (2025/02 upload, adopted-only) also resolves. Cited for: the Compliance Monitoring Procedures (pp. 58-65) including the 60-day correction-period statement, the January 15 Annual Project Certification deadline and the 11 Del. C. sec. 1233 false-statement crime; the Compliance Monitoring Fee (p. 65: $750/unit, $1,000/unit for income averaging, $15/unit annual); the fee schedule at Application Fees and Processing (p. 23: $1,500 application fee, 1.50% x 10 years allocation fee, and the same per-unit monitoring fee); the $250/unit income-averaging election fee (DSHA Average Income Policy, p. 61); the mandatory 30-year commitment (Threshold Requirement 8, p. 26); the qualified contract waiver (Threshold Requirement 10, p. 26, and the Declaration definition, p. 7); and the delegation of monitoring to Spectrum Enterprises, Inc. (p. 58). Biennial document: a 2027-2028 QAP should be expected around late 2026.

33 pages, 1,981,668 bytes, sha256 dfb5dc693c6715aa640a92ca0c7910fa3d660d9949511ca9d9ee7a32c5441aa0. Fetched 2026-08-24 with plain curl and a browser User-Agent; HTTP 200. Section VI, 'Compliance Monitoring Plan' (pp. 22-32), is the operative ongoing-compliance text and is materially more detailed than the compliance manual on fees, audit sampling and the Additional Use Period. EDITION ESTABLISHED AS CURRENT BY: HHFDC's QAP landing page (https://dbedt.hawaii.gov/hhfdc/hhfdc-qualified-application-plan-qap-landing-page/) carries a status timeline whose last row reads 'Final QAP Launched with the 2026 Funding Round. Click here to access FINAL 2026 QAP' and links to the 2026 Consolidated Application page (https://dbedt.hawaii.gov/hhfdc/consolidated-application-for-financing-2026/), which serves this file. TRAP: the three PDFs linked in the body of that same QAP landing page are the 7/31/2025 PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT, its summary of changes and the testimony package -- not the final -- and the draft is what a web search surfaces first (https://dbedt.hawaii.gov/hhfdc/files/2025/06/2026-QAP.For_.Public.Hearing.Ramseyer.pdf). The final was located only by following the timeline row. DATE CORRECTED 2026-08-28: version said 'final version dated 11/14/25' and published was 2025-11-14. That string exists ONLY in the filename. Re-fetched and confirmed the QAP prints no date on any of its 33 pages. Fourth instance of a URL- or filename-derived date reaching published rules, after Texas, North Carolina and Tennessee.

53 pages, 1,623,135 bytes, sha256 944b686e35abfdf01c694f7e5c5efc39c2036e9a1aeea239c96b3ec047ea3c78. The compliance-relevant provisions cited by this corpus (Section 14 Tax Credit Monitoring incl. the rent-increase policy, Section 15 Fees, Section 18 Annual Income Re-Certification, Section 6.2 extended use / Qualified Contract waiver) were checked against the 2025 QAP (final 2024-12-31, sha256 3a0d81b8a078a6c7671aaed3d3527481dab1f40f653ff92f29a9128fb0629fc4) and carry forward essentially verbatim; the 2026 QAP adds Section 13(6), a 100% compliance review before 8609 issuance with 8609s withheld until findings clear.

1,215,997 bytes, sha256 aa2e3f386338dd49b7a26443b87f82f80a5b8c365fcbe5ce7c8b0510bac84b1d. Board-approved 2024-10-16, approved by the Governor 2024-10-24. Cited for Section II.K (30-year minimum affordability, qualified-contract waiver, deemed-transfer rule), Section II.L (compliance monitoring, fee billing/8823 escalation) and the Section IV.B fee schedule ($50/$20 per set-aside unit, $1,500 additional-review fee, ownership-change fees including the discretionary $10,000 fine). A draft 2026 QAP was in circulation as of August 2025 and final 2026 9%/4% QAPs were published December 2025 (novoco.com mirrors); this entry pins the 2025 QAP actually corroborating the August 2025 Compliance Plan. The source_id matches the id pre-registered in data/agencies for this document (key_documents).