538,641 bytes, sha256 1d41502fbb08c47c0f78183aeeddfafd696048e34a32d9d44b170c9498656044. THE CURRENT APPROVED PLAN, per VHFA's own QAP page - and not what search returns: a 'DRAFT for 2026-2027 State of Vermont Qualified Allocation Plan' posted January 2025 ranks in search, and a revised draft was reviewed by the VHFA Board on June 23, 2026, but as of 2026-08-25 neither has been adopted and the QAP page states the 2024-2025 plan is current. Cited for: sec. 3.4 (perpetual affordability through an Extended Use Agreement for all Ceiling Credit and state Rental Housing Tax Credit projects; Bond Credit projects 15-year compliance plus at least 15-year extended use), sec. 3.5 (prior qualified-contract requests and transfer litigation as grounds for disqualification), sec. 6.2 general provisions (training before lease-up, Common Rental Application, DOARH participation, vacancy notices to homeless-service organizations, six-month minimum lease, VAWA), sec. 6.4-6.5 (annual certification; electronic review of at least 20% of files every three years; the 100%-project recertification waiver conditioned on completion of the first annual recertification), sec. 6.6 (correction period up to 90 days, good-cause extension to six months, Form 8823 within 45 days), and the definition of VHFA as the Allocating Agency. The advisory Joint Committee on Tax Credits reviews allocation policy; VHCB co-authors design standards but is not the Section 42 monitor. DATE CORRECTED 2026-08-28. '2024-25' appears NOWHERE in the document -- it is the filename. The cover reads 'Revised 2/6/2023 / Effective 10/1/2023' and the Governor's signature page, which had to be RENDERED because its text layer is garbage, reads 'Effective Date: 5/16/23'. The recorded published 2023-05-01 matches neither. 43 pages. Fifth instance of a filename-derived date on a source record.

The only published description of how VHCB monitors its state-funded portfolio. Two operative statements: 'VHCB's model of perpetual affordability is made possible by housing subsidy covenants and mortgage deeds on all properties that receive our investment', and 'All housing projects funded by VHCB undergo post-construction project monitoring, usually one year after a project is completed and occupied.' Everything else on the page is federal (HUD Section 3, Build America Buy America). WHAT IS NOT THERE, and is recorded as a gap rather than filled: no ongoing monitoring interval after the initial visit, no unit-sample percentage, no annual grantee reporting requirement, no correction period, and no state-fund income or rent limit table.

This is the rule that rewrote the Management and Occupancy Review sections of the project-based Section 8 regulations. Its CFR references are 24 CFR parts 880, 881, 883, 884, 886 and 891, so it reaches Section 202 and Section 811 properties with project-based Section 8 as well as the parts 880-886 family. Two things it did that matter to a compliance specialist: it moved the review FREQUENCY out of the regulation and into a schedule the Secretary publishes in the Federal Register after notice and comment, and it added the requirement at 24 CFR 880.612(a) that a review be conducted within six months following a change in ownership or management. The published schedule notice itself was NOT retrieved for this pass, so the corpus records the six-month post-transfer trigger and not the ordinary review interval. The govinfo PDF is at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-06-27/pdf/2022-13426.pdf.

The PIH-side companion to the HOTMA final rule for section 103 only. Dated from the document's own cover block - 'NOTICE: PIH-2023-03(HA) / Issued: November 2, 2023 / Expires: Effective until amended, superseded, or rescinded' - not from the URL. It is the notice the JOINT sections 102/104 notice (H 2023-10 / PIH 2023-27) points at in its own footnote 1 for section 103, so the two do not overlap: over-income is here, income and assets are there. Cross-references on its face are 81 FR 85996, 83 FR 35490 and PIH-2019-11(HA).

'published' is the currency date the document prints on its own face. This is the only primary authority the corpus has for the Section 811 Project Rental Assistance (811 PRA) program: there is no part of 24 CFR that implements 811 PRA, so subsection (b)(3), added by the Frank Melville Supportive Housing Investment Act of 2010, is where the eligible population (extremely low income), the 25 percent per-project cap, the 30-year use restriction, the 180-month minimum contract term, the prohibition on pairing PRA with a capital advance and the required State health/human-services agency agreements all live. Subsections (d)(3), (e)(1) and (e)(4) govern the capital advance (PRAC) side.

'published' is the currency date the document prints on its own face, not a date inferred from the URL and not an edition date. Carries the provisions the Section 202 PRAC layer actually turns on: (c)(2) project rental assistance, (c)(3) the tenant rent contribution formula, (d) the 40-year very-low-income use restriction, (f)(1) written tenant selection procedures, and (k)(1) the definition of 'elderly person' as a household with at least one member aged 62 or over at initial occupancy. uscode.house.gov re-renders current text, so an amendment moves the content hash.

THIS CHAPTER IS THE REASON THE TACOMA OVERLAY CARRIES TWO PROGRAMME IDS. The brief for this pass anticipated only the opt-in Multifamily Property Tax Exemption. Tacoma also runs a second, structurally different regime under Chapter 1.39: an affordability bonus programme (voluntary, entered by taking a density, height or FAR bonus or by being granted a privately-initiated upzone) and, inside it at 1.39.100, a MANDATORY inclusionary requirement in the areas designated by TMC ch. 13.18 -- ten percent of the units in any development of fifteen units or more. Both branches of Chapter 1.39 are land-use restrictions with no funding award and both are modelled as `local_inclusionary`; 6A.110 is a tax exemption and is `local_tax_abatement`. Sections used: 1.39.020 (covenant agreement, marketing plan, successor-in-interest, net sales proceeds definitions); 1.39.030.A (applicability and the reference to ch. 13.18), .B (holistic review at least every three years); 1.39.040.A (fifty-year affordability and the recorded covenant), .B (income levels by zoning district and bonus tier), .C (thirty percent of the tenant's monthly gross income INCLUDING essential utilities; 33 percent front-end and 50 percent back-end ratios for ownership), .D (proportional phasing), .E (comparable size, bedroom mix, distribution, indistinguishable finish; one Type C Visitable unit), .F (covenant contents, including the affirmative marketing clause at F.5), .G (Housing Division monitors continued affordability and the City reserves the right to establish monitoring fees), .H (resale and forfeiture of net sales proceeds); 1.39.080 (unit counts by district, in-lieu fee amounts stated in the text as being 'as of February 1, 2025' and the voluntary subsequent in-lieu fee formulas); 1.39.090 (predevelopment meeting, covenant as a completeness condition, recorded covenant before final approval); 1.39.100 (the ten percent inclusionary requirement in ch. 13.18 areas).

13.17.020 is the geographic gate on the whole MFTE programme: it lists the sixteen designated mixed-use centres with their original adoption dates, and adds neighbourhood commercial nodes over 20,000 square feet on a transit route, Multifamily High-Density areas, and Urban Residential 3 (UR-3) areas. 13.17.030 does nothing but point at 6A.110 for procedure. Section 13.17.010 was repealed and its definitions relocated to TMC 13.01.170 by Ord. 28613 Ex. G (2019-09-24), which is why 6A.110.010 cites 13.01.170 for most of its terms; 13.01.170 WAS NOT READ THIS PASS.

THE GEOGRAPHIC GATE ON TACOMA'S MANDATORY INCLUSIONARY REQUIREMENT, and it is very narrow. 13.18.030.B's designation table has exactly ONE row: 'Tacoma Mall Neighborhood Subarea: Madison District Inclusionary Housing Pilot Area', Regional Growth Center, incentives 'Maximum height increase; Financial incentives', effective date May 27, 2018. Eight years on, no second area has been designated. 13.18.020 does nothing but adopt TMC 1.39 inside the designated areas. This is what makes the Tacoma inclusionary requirement a pilot rather than a city-wide regime, and it is the fact a compliance specialist most needs before treating a Tacoma property as inclusionary.

THE CHAPTER MOVED OUT OF TITLE 13 AND THE OLD PDF ROUTE IS DEAD. Chapter 13.06A is marked '(Repealed)' in the April 2026 Title 13 contents, and the MFTE programme's substantive provisions live in Title 6, subtitle 6A, chapter 6A.110. Sections used: 6A.110.005 (Chapter 6A.10 General Tax Provisions do not apply); 6A.110.010 (definitions of affordable housing, low-income household, moderate-income household, multi-family housing, permanent residential occupancy, residential target area); 6A.110.020.B (8/12/20-year duration, beginning January 1 following the calendar year of the Final or Temporary Certificate of Occupancy), .E (recorded Covenant Agreement), .F (eight-year eligibility, including the under-twenty-unit homeownership restriction and the 120-day move notice), .G (twelve-year: 20 percent of units at 70 percent Pierce County AMI rental / 115 percent for-sale, and continued qualification to 90 percent), .H (twenty-year: 25 percent built by or sold to a qualified nonprofit or local government, permanently affordable homeownership, 99-year ground lease or deed restriction, sponsor approval of refinancing), .I (12-year extension, 10 percent below market rate, tenant notice at the tenth and eleventh years, one month's rent relocation assistance, no new extensions on or after 2046-01-01), .J (application and fee), .K-.N (conditional certificate, $50.00 extension processing fee, final certificate), .O (annual compliance review declaration and the five-year on-site audit), .P (cancellation, change of use, 60-day notice to the Director and the Pierce County Assessor, additional tax with interest and penalty, lien, Hearing Examiner appeal).

CITED BY NOTHING AND KEPT FOR EXACTLY ONE FACT: that the Tacoma Municipal Code is no longer published as per-title PDFs on cms.cityoftacoma.org and now lives on the City's eCode site. Its body reads 'The information previously available in this PDF file is now on the City of Tacoma's eCode website' and gives the direct link https://ecode360.com/48470095. Its chapter list is itself evidence: 'Chapter 13.06A (Repealed)', which is where an older brief would have expected to find the MFTE provisions, and 'Chapter 13.17 Residential Target Areas' and 'Chapter 13.18 Affordable Housing Inclusionary Development Areas', which is where they partly are.

Predates the April 2026 rule. Treat form guidance here as unconfirmed until re-checked.

TDHCA will publish updated audit workbooks by 1 January 2027; earlier versions become obsolete on that date.

6 pages, 351,506 bytes, sha256 65a2b30ba9562f7a0adb1d2832a844c00417a5dc58da49ebbb74ac3d7cd18780. Fetched 2026-08-28 with plain curl and a standard desktop Chrome User-Agent; HTTP 200, no bot wall. Located from the state document library the agency's own manual designates -- DSHA's 2024 Monitoring and Compliance Manual, Appendix C, is a single page reading "Spectrum/Delaware / Form, Manuals, and Training" over https://spectrumlihtc.com/state-monitoring/delaware/. That page's "Required Forms" table is how the current edition was established. DATE TAKEN FROM THE FACE: every page footer reads "Includes updates to the HUD LIHTC Tenant Data Collection Form - OMB Approval No. 2528-0165 Rev. 9-2024". The library's link label reads "Tenant Income Certification (HOTMA rev 9-2024)"; the label happens to agree with the face, and the face is what is used. THIS IS THE POST-HOTMA EDITION: Part IV's instruction reads "Enter the imputed annual income from the asset if actual cannot not be determined and net assets exceed imputed income limitation", naming the test and printing no dollar figure. Part VII prints SIX student explanations where IRC 42(i)(3)(D) provides five, the sixth being "Extended-Use Period". The same file is served on the Hawaii page of the same library, but Hawaii's own Required Forms table serves the January 2021 edition instead (src.hi.form_tic_use_after_2021), so the two states monitored by the same delegate are on different editions.

'published' carries the LATEST AMENDMENT DATE eCFR's own versions metadata records for part 245 (2016-12-16), not a publication date for the part and nothing inferred from the URL. Subpart D (24 CFR 245.305 - 245.330) is the rent-increase notice and comment procedure and is the reason this corpus holds the part; 24 CFR 245.310(a)'s prescribed notice form carries a footnote saying separate basic and market rent columns are used only for section 236 projects. IMPORTANT SCOPE LIMIT: 24 CFR 245.10(a)(3) restricts a state or local housing finance agency section 236 project with no HUD-insured or HUD-held mortgage to subparts A, B and C plus subpart E, so subpart D does NOT reach that class; 24 CFR 245.330 addresses non-insured projects and was not read in full for this pass. Part 245 also reaches 221(d)(3) BMIR, Rent Supplement, Section 8 LMSA, project-based Section 8, enhanced vouchers, Section 202 and Section 811 projects. eCFR re-renders current text, so this source is not in the codified-law blind spot described in CLAUDE.md.

Tennessee adds creed and places the class list once at the head of the section.

ADDED TO SETTLE, RATHER THAN REPEAT, THE CLAIM THAT TEXAS 'VOIDS INCLUSIONARY ZONING'. Read on its own face, 214.905(a) bars a municipality from adopting a requirement 'in any form' that establishes A MAXIMUM SALES PRICE for a privately produced housing unit or residential building lot. That is an OWNERSHIP prohibition and it is not a rental one, and 214.905(b)(1) expressly preserves the municipality's authority to 'create or implement an incentive, contract commitment, density bonus, or other voluntary program designed to increase the supply of moderate or lower-cost housing units', with further carve-outs for homestead preservation districts under ch. 373A, for pre-1 September 2005 development agreements, and for urban land bank property. What forecloses a mandatory municipal RENT obligation is a different section: 214.902 permits rent control only where the governing body finds a housing emergency due to a disaster as defined by Gov't Code 418.004 AND the governor approves the ordinance. So the accurate statement for this corpus is that a Texas municipal affordability obligation must be VOLUNTARY and must ride on an instrument the owner chose to sign -- which is why both Houston and Dallas overlays are tax instruments rather than land-use ones. Section 214.906 also bars regulating a tract as a manufactured home community below four spaces, and 214.219 addresses minimum habitability standards for multifamily rental buildings in certain municipalities; neither was read in full and neither is relied on.

Rewritten by HB 2071, 88th Legislature Regular Session 2023 -- "Relating to certain public facilities, including public facilities used to provide affordable housing" -- filed without the Governor's signature and effective immediately on 18 June 2023. Applies to developments acquired, or with occupancy beginning, on or after that date. CORRECTION: this record previously claimed the chapter was "amended again by HB 21 in 2025" and dated it 2025-09-01. Chapter 303 as currently published carries no 2025 amendment note anywhere; every note in 303.042, .0421, .0425 and .0426 reads Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1169 (H.B. 2071). HB 21 of the 89th Legislature rewrote chapter 394, housing finance corporations, which is a different chapter and a different programme.

THE CHAPTER 394 HFC REGIME IS NEW LAW AND IS NOT OTHERWISE IN THIS CORPUS. HB 21 (89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025), effective 28 May 2025, added sections 394.9026 (conditions for beneficial ad valorem tax treatment) and 394.9027 (audit requirements), rewrote 394.905 (exemption from taxes and fees), and added the geographic limitations at 394.031(c)-(d) and 394.037(a-1). Together they are a complete second Texas tax-exemption regime running parallel to chapter 303's PFC regime and differing from it in ways that change answers: a second set-aside option (10 percent very low plus 40 percent middle income), rent bands at 50, 60, 80 and 100 percent of AMI rather than 60 and 80, a TWO-year compliance grace on an acquired occupied development rather than one, a 180-day period to resolve noncompliance rather than sixty days, and an annual rent-reduction test at 50 percent of forgone taxes with a pro rata cash true-up to each taxing unit. Every existing `tx_pfc` rule in this corpus is chapter 303. A `tx_hfc` program id and a state-layer pass over 394.9026 and 394.9027 are recommended. Sections read in full this pass: 394.027, 394.031, 394.037, 394.9025, 394.9026, 394.9027, 394.902, 394.905. The rest of the chapter -- incorporation, board, powers, bonds -- was not.

Subsections (a) and (b) name six classes and do not include disability; subsection (c) carves out a conviction for the illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled substance.

ADDED BECAUSE src.tx.tac_10f IS SUPERSEDED IN PART. CM-SubCh-F-Searchable.pdf was re-fetched 2026-08-27 and is byte-identical to the corpus hash (1,362,467 bytes, sha256 2bfceae19671d1ec69fc7d318f4f31ca431aa8dc7c8b4e55763bc059f3569c2f), but it is the 2 January 2025 adoption: every one of its 27 Source Notes reads 'adopted to be effective January 2, 2025, 49 TexReg 10513' and its table of contents stops at s10.627. TDHCA's Compliance Manuals and Rules page still labels both the Secretary of State link and the PDF 'effective 1/02/2025' and has not reissued either. So nine sections of Subchapter F -- ss10.601, 10.607, 10.611, 10.612, 10.613, 10.614, 10.621, 10.622, 10.625 -- plus the entirely new s10.628 exist in force only in this Register issue. Sections 10.605, 10.615 and 10.616 were NOT touched by the April 2026 actions and are still correctly cited to src.tx.tac_10f. Note the effective-date split on s10.628: the Register states 'Effective date: April 29, 2026' while the rule's own text at (b) says 'This rule is effective beginning on August 1, 2026'.

Confirmed reachable 2026-08-22 via curl with a standard desktop Chrome User-Agent header (thda.org 403s a bare curl/no-UA request but requires no JS challenge). 75 pages, 1,111,281 bytes, downloaded and hashed (sha256 6bc2c372995bfab8bf1d1205a0408e008442e1295736838e9b255d676f722f7a). PDF metadata: created 2025-12-09, modified 2026-01-06. This pass reads Section 10 (Compliance Requirements and Monitoring Process, pp. 31-38) and the compliance/monitoring fee table (p. 17) in full; Part I/II allocation-process sections and appendices not read. DATE CORRECTED 2026-08-28: published was 2026-01-06, taken from the PDF ModDate and the url's /2026/01/ segment. Re-fetched (1,111,281 bytes, unchanged) and confirmed the QAP prints no publication date anywhere -- only the two approval dates on page 1. This is the third time a URL-derived date has reached published rules, after nine Texas rules 16 months adrift and fourteen North Carolina rules 6 months.