Skip to content
RelySign in
← Back to atlas
federalUnited StatesCommunity Development Block Grant (rental housing activities)property_standards

No CDBG funds - and no non-HUD funds on a choice-limiting action - may be committed until HUD or the State approves the Request for Release of Funds and the responsible entity's certification

cdbg.property_standards.environmental_review_gates_commitment_of_funds · v1.0.0

This is the hardest gate in CDBG and the one that most often invalidates an otherwise complete housing deal, because it reaches PRIVATE money as well as public. Neither a recipient nor ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS - public or private, nonprofit or for-profit, or any of their contractors - may commit HUD assistance on an activity or project until HUD or the State has approved the recipient's Request for Release of Funds (RROF) and the related certification from the responsible entity. And until that approval, no such participant may commit NON-HUD FUNDS on, or undertake, the activity if it WOULD HAVE AN ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OR LIMIT THE CHOICE OF REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES. Acquisition, demolition and the start of construction are the classic choice-limiting actions. Three carve-outs exist and are narrow. An activity that is EXEMPT under 24 CFR 58.34, or CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED under 58.35(b) absent extraordinary circumstances, needs no RROF and may proceed once the responsible entity documents its determination, but 58.6 requirements still apply. An OPTION AGREEMENT is allowable before the review is complete if it is subject to a determination on the desirability of the property made as a result of the completed review and the option cost is a NOMINAL portion of the purchase price. And relocation assistance required by 24 CFR part 42 may be committed before RROF approval. The responsible entity assumes HUD's environmental responsibilities by grant agreement or by certifying on HUD Form 7015.15, and the certification is executed by its Certifying Officer.

Domain note: filed under property_standards because the corpus has no environmental-review domain and the obligation attaches to the property before development. The companion CDBG Davis-Bacon rule is filed the same way so the two development-stage gates are findable together.
Confidence
high
Effective from
2003-09-29
Consequence model
agency finding with cure
Last reviewed
2026-08-22

Evidence required

  • Land use affordability covenant from an entitlement concession(zero_or_more)
  • HOME written agreement(zero_or_more)

Citations

All sources verified within 1 day
  • Environmental Review Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD Environmental Responsibilities
    24 CFR 58.22(a)
    regulationSource ↗verified 1d ago
  • Environmental Review Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD Environmental Responsibilities
    24 CFR 58.22(b)
    regulationSource ↗verified 1d ago
  • Environmental Review Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD Environmental Responsibilities
    24 CFR 58.22(d)
    regulationSource ↗verified 1d ago
  • Environmental Review Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD Environmental Responsibilities
    24 CFR 58.4(a)
    regulationSource ↗verified 1d ago
  • Community Development Block Grants
    24 CFR 570.604
    regulationSource ↗verified 1d ago
  • Community Development Block Grants
    24 CFR 570.503(b)(5)(i)
    regulationSource ↗verified 1d ago