Data status

Retained to distinguish this older edition from the newer agency manual. It is not cited by the rule records at the time of this note. It is listed here because ADFA still serves it from the same tax-credit document-library page as the current 2026 manual (re-uploaded under a /2024/12/ path in December 2024, which makes it look recent), and because it is the edition mirrored by Novogradac (novoco.com/public-media/documents/arkansas_14.pdf) and echoed in the Arkansas Secretary of State rules register (109.04.12-002, 109.04.11-001), so it is what a search-first workflow is most likely to land on. Three of its figures are materially wrong against the 2026 manual and would produce incorrect findings: it states a maximum 60-day correction period (2026: 30 days), a Tier-1 monitoring fee of 8% of the annual credit allocation (2026 manual and 2026 QAP: 10%), and UPCS and/or ADFA-approved design standards as the physical inspection standard (2026: NSPIRE). It also predates the ADFA Property Management Portal / MITAS regime entirely, describing a paper 'Administrative File/Binder' that the 2026 manual expressly replaces.

REGISTERED SO THAT A READER WHO MEETS IT CAN IDENTIFY IT AS STALE; CITED BY NO RULE. Superseded by the Administrative Policy Guidelines adopted 18 March 2025, and yet still linked from the County's own ADU/WDU developer resources page immediately alongside the current edition, under the label '2021 Countywide and Tysons Urban Center Workforce Dwelling Unit Administrative Policy Guidelines'. The County also still serves the 2007 Countywide and 2010 Tysons editions from the same page. THREE SUPERSEDED EDITIONS AND THE CURRENT ONE ARE ALL PUBLISHED SIDE BY SIDE, and search engines will surface any of them. The 2021 edition's rent example is built on a $126,000 AMI and its rent table tops out at 80 percent of AMI, so its figures are visibly stale, but its structural provisions read very like the 2025 edition's and are easy to mistake for current. NOTE THE COMPLICATION THAT MAKES THIS MORE THAN AN ARCHIVING PROBLEM: under the 2025 edition's Opt-In provision a development proffered under an earlier edition remains administered under THAT edition unless the owner opts in, so a superseded edition can still be the operative document for a specific property.

76 pages, 809,919 bytes, sha256 df084c92f93d993b8b6bf88bbc1336be2890ddbf628390ed107d7d170a2f1524. SUPERSEDED by the 2025-2026 edition (August 2025) but still live at its original path on 2026-08-25 (HTTP 200) and ranked ABOVE the current edition in web search; the 2019 edition is also still served. Recorded per the standing convention as a source cited by nothing, so the status page can carve it out of the refresh queue. The material difference from the current edition: this one inspects to UPCS (sec. 5.T) where the 2025-2026 edition elects NSPIRE with the 24-hour life-threatening cure. An overlay built from the search-first hit would encode the wrong inspection standard.

THIS RECORD REPLACES THE EXISTING src.ma.boston.article_79 ENTRY IN data/sources/sources.json IN FULL. It is written here rather than edited in place because agents do not touch the shared sources file; the integrator must overwrite the existing entry, not append this one, and scripts/integrate_pending.py will NOT do that -- it skips ids already present. WHAT CHANGED IN THIS RECORD, 2026-08-31. authority_weight demoted from 'regulation' to 'secondary' and kind from 'regulation' to 'other': this document is a pre-adoption draft, not enacted law, and weighting it as a regulation overstated it. 'superseded' set to 2023-11-30, the date the Zoning Commission adopted Article 79 as Text Amd. No. 466. 'effective' set to null: the draft never took effect; Article 79 did, on 1 October 2024. The access_notes claim that the codified text could not be fetched is corrected. CITED BY NOTHING as of 2026-08-31. All fourteen Boston rules were re-pointed at the codified article. Kept rather than deleted because the document is still served at a live BPDA url, still ranks in search, and is what somebody meeting an older internal memo will find. WHERE IT DIFFERS FROM THE ENACTED ARTICLE, established by direct comparison on 2026-08-31: 79-6 says 'for a period of AT LEAST thirty (30) years' where the code says 'for a period of thirty (30) years'; 79-8 says the first 50 percent is due 'at the issuance of a building permit' where the code says 'a FULL building permit'; 79-9 strikes 'Covered Project' and inserts nothing, leaving 'any for which an application ... has been filed', where the code reads 'any development with a residential component'. Everything else is wording. See src.ma.boston.article_79_codified for the full diff. THE MOST EXPENSIVE THING THIS DOCUMENT DID was not a difference from the code but a misreading of the redline itself: four rules recorded 'drafting defects' in Table A -- an 18 percent square-footage floor inside a 20 percent requirement -- from provisos that are struck through on the page. Removed text read as enacted text. The codified table has no such provisos. 8 pages, 214,709 bytes. Dates off the document's own face: the effective date is stated in 79-9; the November 8, 2023 adoption date is boston.gov's own label for this file; the PDF's authoring timestamp is 2023-10-26.

Confirmed reachable 2026-08-22 (230-page manual, downloaded directly from chfainfo.com and hashed). This pass reads Chapters 2, 4 and 7 only (energy reporting, vacant unit rule area, and recertification/transfers) — not the full manual. EDITION DRIFT, found 2026-08-28. This record described a '2024' / 230-page manual. The recorded url is a CHFA GUID (b3cb1898-...) that serves the edition, not a fixed file, and it now returns a 239-page PDF whose cover reads 'May 2026 / 05/26.v5' with a HOTMA chapter -- 2,637,454 bytes, sha256 4eaf01c50c1380f86ae838fb23e8e75a613852fa26bba32f4f8d0ca0089947ef, confirmed by direct fetch. CHFA also serves a separate 'Pre-HOTMA' manual at a different GUID, 184pp dated October 2022, so the 2024 edition is not available anywhere found. THE ARCHIVER DID NOT MISS THIS: its first hash of this source, taken 2026-08-23, is already 4eaf01c5... -- the May 2026 edition. The hash was correct from the start; the human-readable version and page count were wrong and nothing compares those two. The four co.json rules citing this record use page-number locators and carry NO quotes. Their sections were re-located in the served edition and are within a few pages of the cited ranges (7.4 at p.130 vs 130-133; 7.6 at p.136 vs 135-137; Energy Use at p.20 vs p.19), so they remain usable -- but with no quotes there is no way to confirm their SUBSTANCE survived the edition change, only their headings. Those four should be re-read against src.co.chfa_manual_2026_05 and given quotes.

Retained because 20 December 2024 is a live cutoff in the current rules -- the 40-year rental and 30-year ownership control periods attach to units created on or after that date, prior round units created before it stay on their own instruments, and 5:80-26.17(b)1 freezes 24 CFR 5.609 at its text 'as it was in effect on December 20, 2024'. A reader reconstructing what changed on that date needs this document; a reader asking what the rule says today must not use it.

60,376 bytes, sha256 92cc10e5ff6a9ea56c924eb7c26ef020fbfd9728443b7d649b189b487e5c2128. Fetched with plain curl and a standard browser User-Agent; no bot wall. The chapter is now a one-page stub whose entire text is: 'CHAPTER 12 / LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDITS / Rescinded ARC 8902C, IAB 2/19/25, effective 3/26/25.' Cited for exactly that proposition and no more. Its significance for the Iowa overlay is structural: earlier printings of this chapter incorporated the IFA compliance manual by reference and gave the program an administrative-rule layer; after 3/26/25 there is none, so the QAP and the compliance manual are the state-law instruments. ARC 8902C's explanatory text (rules.iowa.gov/Notice/Details/8902C, read but not separately hashed or added as a source this pass) states the reason: under 2024 Iowa Acts, Senate File 2387, the Authority is no longer required to adopt rules for the low-income housing tax credit, and the program is administered through the qualified allocation plan adopted under IRC Section 42. The same ARC rescinded six other IFA chapters (20, 22, 23, 31, 36, 40).

RECORDED AS A SUPERSEDED SOURCE THAT IS STILL CITED, BECAUSE THE FIGURE IT CARRIES IS THE ANSWER TO A POINT-IN-TIME QUESTION. Its Exhibit A states of the Dallas Housing Finance Corporation that 'Fifty-one percent of the units must be set aside for affordable housing.' Nine weeks later, Resolution No. 26-0742 of 22 April 2026 replaced that with 'at least ninety percent of the units must be set aside for persons of low- and moderate-income affordable housing' for LIHTC and non-LIHTC properties alike. A DHFC development approved on or before 21 April 2026 was approved against 51 percent, and this is the instrument that says so. The resolution's own operative sections did NOT touch the corporation statements -- SECTION 1 amends only the Dallas Homebuyer Assistance Program, and the DHFC and DPFC amendments were deferred from that meeting to 22 April -- so the 51 percent text is the pre-existing Catalog language carried forward, not something adopted that day. Its recitals are the primary source for the repeal of DHP33 on 10 December 2025 by Resolution No. 25-1895, the adoption of the Drivers of Opportunity Policy Framework by Resolution No. 25-1836, and the creation of OHCE on 1 October 2025.

Diff against src.ca.rtc_214 (AB 2897 edition), run 2026-09-02, confined to subdivision (g): (1) (g)(1)(A) gained 'qualified 501(c)(3) bonds, as that term is defined in Section 145 of Title 26 of the United States Code' as a qualifying financing source; (2) (g)(2)(A)(iii) was split, the LIHTC 140-percent-of-AMI over-income tolerance becoming subclause (I) and a NEW subclause (II) adding a 100-percent-of-AMI tolerance for non-LIHTC property under an enforceable and verifiable agreement with a public agency, operative 2024-25 through 2028-29; (3) (g)(2)(A)(iv), the community land trust clause, LOST its condition that the lease be 'subject to a contract that complies with the requirements of paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) of Section 402.1'; (4) (g)(3)(D)(ii)(I) widened from 'units specified in clause (iii)' to 'units specified in clause (iii) or (iv)'. ATTRIBUTION NOT ESTABLISHED: the diff spans amendments chaptered between September 2022 and September 2024 and leginfo's billCompareClient renders a chaptered bill against CURRENT law, so it shows no marks for section 214 and cannot say which chapter carried which change.

The Live Local Act land use preemption as originally enacted, and much shorter than what it became. Subsection (7) runs only to paragraph (i). It reaches areas zoned for commercial, industrial or mixed use and nothing else -- no religious-institution property, no flexibly zoned areas, no publicly owned property. There is no floor area ratio provision at all, no 1 July 2023 baseline, no exclusions from the density or height survey, no single-family adjacency cap, no historic-parcel provisions, no military-installation bar, no 10 percent nonresidential ceiling, no building-moratorium prohibition, no statutory definitions of commercial or industrial use, no annual report and no attorney-fee provisions. Parking relief is only a duty to CONSIDER a reduction within one-half mile of a major transit stop. Subsection (6)'s self-executing ten percent route reaches commercial and industrial parcels only. The single geographic exclusion is recreational and commercial working waterfront in an industrial zone. Cited by this corpus wherever a rule states what changed and when.

The SB 328 rewrite, and the middle term that makes the chronology decidable. Present for the first time: floor area ratio at 150 percent, the single-family adjacency height cap, the quarter-mile military installation bar, mandatory parking reduction and transit-oriented elimination, the website administrative-approval policy, and the exclusions that keep bonus-derived and prior-Live-Local buildings out of the density, FAR and height surveys. Still ABSENT, and therefore ch. 2025-172's rather than SB 328's: religious-institution and flexibly zoned sites, the 1 July 2023 baselines, the 10 percent nonresidential ceiling, the longer list of prohibited entitlement demands, the historic-parcel provisions, administrative demolition approval, the (7)(n) definitions, the building-moratorium prohibition, the annual report to the state land planning agency and the $250,000 attorney-fee cap. Recorded because an earlier draft of this pass misattributed several of those to SB 328 on recall; this artifact is what settled it.

The ch. 2025-172 edition, and the one that carries most of what people attribute to SB 102 or SB 328. First present here: religious-institution and flexibly zoned sites, the 1 July 2023 alternative baselines for density, floor area ratio and height, the 10 percent nonresidential ceiling, the longer list of prohibited entitlement demands, the historic-parcel height survey and architectural-design provisions, administrative demolition approval, the 15-percent-on-request parking reduction, the (7)(n) definitions of commercial, industrial and mixed use, the building-moratorium prohibition at subsection (9), the annual report to the state land planning agency at subsection (10), the $250,000 attorney-fee cap and the adjacent-parcel inclusion. CORRECTION RECORDED: an earlier draft of the Live Local depth pass asserted, from a partial grep, that subsection (9) and the (7)(n) definitions were 2026 additions absent from this edition. Both are present here and absent from the 2024 edition. The wrong version never reached data/ or the database. Still absent from this edition, and therefore belonging to the 2026 group (ss. 15 ch. 2026-14; 2 ch. 2026-163; 2 ch. 2026-179): county, municipal and school-district property as sites, the co-applicant sentences, the 15-foot assemblage rule, the open-character-district exclusion, and the sentence barring height restrictions imposed through setbacks or stepbacks.

The Live Local Act as originally enacted. Load-bearing differences from the current text, all confirmed by diff in the same session: subsection (4) does not exist; (3)(b) has no area-of-critical-state-concern ten-unit alternative; (3)(a)2. measures the five-year 'newly constructed' window from the first submission of a request for certification OR an application for exemption, 'whichever is earlier', where the current text measures from the certification request alone; (3)(d) is phrased as an entitlement of qualified property rather than as a direction to the property appraiser and carries no proportionate-common-area paragraph; (3)(g) says a determination is not 'final agency action' without the current addition that it is also not a grant of an exemption; the ten-year lookback sits at (3)(j) rather than (3)(i); there is no transient-public-lodging exclusion and no (3)(o) taxing-authority opt-out. Cited by this corpus for point-in-time questions about the 2024 tax roll, which is the first roll subsection (3) applied to.

The edition that first carries subsection (4) -- the exemption for a multifamily project subject to a 99-year recorded land use restriction agreement, exempt from the January 1 assessment immediately succeeding placement in service, with a penalty for early exit equal to 100 percent of the amount financed multiplied by each year remaining -- created by ch. 2024-158 and stated to first apply to the 2026 tax roll. It also first carries the area-of-critical-state-concern ten-unit alternative at (3)(b)2.b., the proportionate-common-area paragraph at (3)(d)2., the transient-public-lodging exclusion, and the (3)(o) taxing-authority opt-out beginning with the 2025 tax roll. In the 2025 edition ch. 2025-208 adds a housing finance authority under part IV of chapter 159 as an alternative counterparty to the subsection (4) agreement.

Kept so that the s. 196.1979 rules can be dated to the roll on which each provision actually took effect rather than to the roll the section's own subsection names. Established 2026-09-02 by diffing the 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026 editions word by word: the 2023 text (8,861 characters of operative text, History 's. 9, ch. 2023-17.') set the application deadline as a bare 'March 1', described the website list as one of 'certified properties', gave the ordinance-delivery duty as ten days 'after its adoption' with no outer date, and contained NO subsection on property appraiser review and NO subsection on the common-area share. The 2024 edition (9,931 characters, History 's. 9, ch. 2023-17; s. 14, ch. 2024-158; s. 5, ch. 2024-188.') added all of those, renumbered the first-application clause from (7) to (9), and is word-for-word what the 2025 and 2026 editions still serve. So the current text is the ch. 2024-158 / ch. 2024-188 text, not the text that governed the 2024 roll.

Superseded by Ord. 25-114 on 12 November 2025 and again in form by Ord. 26-023 on 6 May 2026. Kept out of the refresh queue by the superseded date. Article I of Chapter 188 (Secs. 188-1 to 188-6, housing-accommodation listing licences, adopted 1986) is untouched by any of this and is not part of the affordable housing regime.

RECORDED AS SUPERSEDED AND CITED BY NOTHING, per the CLAUDE.md rule that an agency serving a stale edition alongside the current one should have the stale edition on file as an uncited source. DATED FROM ITS OWN FACE: the page footer reads '(Updated 04/2023)' and the section's amendment history ends '(Ord. 28798 Ex. A; passed Dec. 14, 2021...)'. It therefore predates Ord. 28910 (2023-10-31), which added 6A.110.005 and disapplied the general tax provisions; Ord. 29007 (2024-12-17); and Substitute Ord. 29059 Ex. A (2025-10-07), which is the ordinance that introduced the 90-percent continued-qualification threshold, the recorded Covenant Agreement precondition, the 10-percent-below-market test for a twelve-year extension, and the under-twenty-unit homeownership restriction on the eight-year option. Four separate compliance obligations in this overlay are absent from this document. THE DIFFERENCES WERE MEASURED, NOT ASSUMED: a machine comparison of every quote in the overlay against this printing found that the 2023 text letters the exemption-duration subsections 'E, F, or G' where the current chapter letters them 'F, G, or H'; that it starts the exemption clock from 'the Final Certificate of Tax Exemption' where the current chapter says 'the Final or Temporary Certificate of Occupancy'; that it CODIFIES the application fee as '$1,000 for four units, plus $100 per additional multi-family unit, up to a maximum total fee to the City of $5,000', which the current chapter replaced with a reference to the published Fee Schedule and which is why the City's 2022 tip sheet still states that range; and that it contains neither the annual declaration filed with the Director nor the five-year on-site audit recital at all. The `superseded` date is set to the effective date of the first amendment it does not contain. The City's live MFTE programme page still links it under 'Resources' as 'TMC CHAPTER 6A.110'.